The Forum > Article Comments > Child abuse in the Family Court > Comments
Child abuse in the Family Court : Comments
By Sunita Shaunak, published 29/7/2008The prevailing view of 'highly qualified experts' used by the Family Court is that many protective parents lie about their child's abuse.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Page 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- ...
- 32
- 33
- 34
-
- All
1. CHILD PROTECTION WORKERS will be assigned to some Victorian Schools, depending on need. It seems that at present school staff are hindered in the effectiveness of their reports of child abuse, by the need for corroboration.
Provision for records to be transferred interstate will also be made in future. This follows a case where a family (with extreme child abuse) moved to South Australia to escape further intervention by the authorities.
Child protection is a State matter, which helps to explain some of our difficulties with the Federal Family Court.
I had already realized that it is difficult for these State-run child protection authorities to act on one complaint of abuse. We can therefore notify the school and GP etc, to improve the likelihood of intervention. I don't think either (schools or GPs) can respond to us, but they may take note.
See my next posting for the second item headed CHILD ABUSE