Why pick on Hilary?
Since when has truth had anything whatsoever to do with USA politics?

Meanwhile I find this assessment of the rottenness at the core of the Republican party quite compelling.

http://valenzuelasveritas.blogspot.com/2007/05/unmasking-of-authoritarians.html

Also

http://valenzuelasveritas.blogspot.com/2004/10/catastrophic-success-of-republican.html

If Hillary were to become President, she could bring back the furniture she and Bill took from the White House when Bill left the Presidency, with some estimates that the furniture could be worth up to $250,000.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/opinion/10herbert.html?ref=opinion

If she doesn’t become President, then she and Bill could be charged with stealing the furniture.

This may be more motivation for her to win (at any cost to anyone else).

shall we also see ariel writing on bush? or does playing loose with the truth to start wars not concern him?

Were an Australian politician to claim he/she came under potentially mortal gun fire in a War Zone, their career would go the way of the dodo. It was bad enough when Bishop became stroppy about using a Mobile Phone on a commercial flight.

Talking of flights, on US CCN, Glenn Beck; said that Clinton didn't want to be seen in an older Jet-Stream and had a new one flown to her, so she look more impressive, when alighting.

Maybe Hillary Clinton shouls have a chat with Paul L.A.W.Keating or Carmen Lawrence or a seance with Richard Nixon: Or her hubby, no didn't have ...