The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > ‘Lazarus with a triple bypass’ could well become Harry Houdini > Comments

‘Lazarus with a triple bypass’ could well become Harry Houdini : Comments

By John Warhurst, published 30/8/2007

A Kevin Rudd election victory is looking likely: however, there are four reasons why Labor might still lose.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
If the recent polls are correct, labor is now seen as the better economic managers.

100 seats here we come. No Prime Minister has ever gone to an election without being the preferred PM in the polls, even Keating in 1996 was in front.

Bye Bye Mr Howard I hope you enjoy your retirement.
Posted by ruawake, Thursday, 30 August 2007 4:53:26 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Labor is a lot of PR and very little policy. They are hoping to win on advertising rather than substance. We are seeing a lot of Rudd and very little of the team. It is all aimed at making sure that apart from a few appearances by the trusted few (like Swan) or the ones he needs (like Gillard) the rest of the team remains quiet. There are two reasons for this, the first is that he does not want the inexperienced ones making bloopers and reminding people that the team lacks experience, the second is that he does not to remind people of how many members of what is likely to be his front bench are former unionists...and the influence the unions are likely to have.
It is not quite a one man band. Rudd's own minders are too savvy for that. They orchestrated the 'leaking' of the night-club visit knowing full well that the positive effect was going to be greater than the negative. It portrayed Rudd as the 'honest, contrite, Aussie larrikin' designed to appeal to voters.
This is what is so disturbing, that the electorate is apparently being taken in by a mirage.
Posted by Communicat, Thursday, 30 August 2007 5:11:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I'm all for recycling, but AaHE Is it possible for you to post something different?
Posted by Ginx, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:01:29 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Howard is a consummate politician no doubt, but that is the problem.

Unfortunately, he lacks genuine compassion.

This is the fundamental difference between a neoconservative government (a.k.a. Howard) and a convergent or centrist government (a.k.a. Rudd).

In other words, it's the vision of the leaders that will direct the future of Australia.

For me, Howard has passed his use-by date and is beginning to smell, really bad.
Posted by Q&A, Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:58:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Communicat while your bitterness is apparent you should understand the ALP has much help in unseating Howard.
His new conservatives, those who have only ever voted for him, and so very many former Liberal voters are driving the polls.
Bitterness about this will not change the fact conservatives slept while Labor took wrong leaders and wrong policy's to elections.
The wounds are self inflicted and the victims of Howard's unconcern many.
Election night at Belly's! a party to behold!
Posted by Belly, Friday, 31 August 2007 7:06:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Q&A continues the myth that the left are compassionate and bad while the right are mean and bad. This is a ridiculous notion. Mr Howard travels the world and it is a waste of tax payers money. Mr Rudd travels to the US and visits strip joints on tax payers money and he is only be human. Surely you can come up with better than that.
Posted by runner, Friday, 31 August 2007 9:48:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy