The Forum > Article Comments > Islamic ticket sends all the wrong messages > Comments
Islamic ticket sends all the wrong messages : Comments
By Shakira Hussein, published 24/1/2007Muslim candidates will distract attention from legitimate concerns.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Page 13
-
- All
>>Pericles
True, Jesus was a minor character and not really worth writing about during his lifetime.<<
I have not actually posted before on this thread.
And anyway, where did I say that Jesus was a minor character? Not just here, but on any thread?
I'm used to being taken out of context, but to invent my entire argument is taking "straw man" techniques just a little too far.
I find your logic highly questionable too, by the way, but I refuse to defend a position that I have not adopted.
By the way...
>>Also true, the gospels were written by people who knew Jesus<<
I think you accidentally missed out a "not" in this sentence.
Just a quick glance at your "evidence" shows that i) Pliny wrote about Christians, not Jesus, ii) Tacitus wrote about Christus, again without details, which just leaves iii) Josephus to give him a name and a religious setting "... a wise man who was called Jesus, and his conduct was good, and he was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples."
But once again, I am not justifying a position for or against the existence of Jesus the person. What I have said all along is that there are no contemporary recordings of all the stuff that made him (posthumously) famous: water, wine; loaves, fishes; leper, cured; lame, walked; dead, restored to life etc. etc.
Unless the place was full of idiots, you would have thought that someone would have written a word or two. And that someone else would have taken it upon themselves to make sure the record survived?
Wouldn't you?
But as I understand it, the lack of contemporary support is also taken as irrefutable evidence, on the basis of "surely if the stories were invented, wouldn't they have invented some sources too?"
As I said before (in another thread entirely) this is the classic conspiracy argument: the very lack of evidence is itself evidence...