The Forum > Article Comments > Can democracy survive George W. Bush? > Comments
Can democracy survive George W. Bush? : Comments
By Jan De Pauw, published 19/1/2007President George W. Bush's legacy is far from inconsequential, but far from detrimental - his tenure as a 'war president' may even help invigorate democracy.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
Off topic still mate. We don't have democracy here, just someone's version of it. Quoting other's comments is a lazy way of pursuing an issue and is indicative of your innacurate quote, mine, not David's. There is no vote on a replacement. Start a thread yourself on that.
The revelation you refer to has been government knowledge since it happened mate. It's just they didn't tell us.
David,
The three Parties I guess are Labor, Libs and Nats? ( The Greens? Not in my view) I see Libs and Nats as one despite the QLD charades. Of course nationally they do have numbers but essentially most electorates have two choices, Labor or coalition.
Agree of course on the minors and I would greatly wish there were and will be more. Anything to break the hold the 2 majors (my view) have on government. Don't forget the DLP in Victoria either. They're back!
Re minors building up in State. Not here in QLD David. Beattie has a stranglehold and we all saw what Abbott, Beattie and Howard did to remove the danger of One Nation. There's still one or two up here but it's over for them. Other States do have more too but the NT doesn't. Not sure of numbers elswhere.
I'm strongly for minors and always vote that way David. In the end it's mostly a choice at the bottom of the ticket for Labor or Coalition. No choice I see or want.
Democrats seemed to have a conscience but Meg Lees and the GSt blew that out of the water. Therefore their demise. Minors who make deals for the brief spotlight are a waste of time.
Thank goodness Family First changed the deal with Howard, after being let down of course but he has seen the light and lost what he bargained away too.