The Forum > Article Comments > West Papua - still calling for its freedom > Comments
West Papua - still calling for its freedom : Comments
By Andrew Johnson, published 26/10/2006Australians must call on our government to ask the UN to resume its decolonisation obligations in West Papua.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
Posted by Perseus, Thursday, 26 October 2006 11:56:35 AM
| |
This is a ripe situation that truly warrants Australia to experience her Territorial Power within the region. Don't waste away in Iraq.
Continuous attempt to shrug it off by Australia and say it's an international matter clearly demonstrates "lack of bones". PNGean fuzzy wuzzy descendants are still around to resurrect the Kokoda drama. There is absolutely no way that the Javanese will walk over us. Posted by Forever Optimist PNGean, Thursday, 26 October 2006 12:58:53 PM
| |
The “genocide of their people”? Is there any evidence that Indonesia is actually committing genocide in West Papua? I read an article recently claiming that the abuse reported in West Papua was greatly exaggerated. So, most of us don’t know what goes on in West Papua, and it is, therefore, quite futile for people to try convincing us either way. In this fellow’s case, the claim that “we” wiped out nearly 90% of our indigenous population makes him suspect. The demise of aborigines to the current population can be attributed directly to deliberate “wiping out” in only a very small way. He also wants the UN to take part in the undoing of the present situation. I thought it had UN approval in the first place.
Most Australians will not “stand up to the challenge” as the author (who, like all those of his holier-than-thou type, believe that everybody should agree with him) asks. (a) It is not their “challenge” – they don’t care, and (b) The Australian Government has wisely announced that it will not seek independence for West Papua. The Government has already made a huge error of judgement by not returning the 42 Papuan illegals. Added to this, Australia has enough problems with tin pot, badly governed “independent” countries in the area now. Australians need independence for West Papua like they need a hole in the head. Posted by Leigh, Thursday, 26 October 2006 1:20:15 PM
| |
Huh?
<i>Added to this, Australia has enough problems with tin pot, badly governed “independent” countries in the area now.</i> Those countries can survive with or without Australia's intervention. Did you watch SBS Lateline last night? Solomon's PM emphatically stated that he ", mate - he simply doesn't care about Australia's AID or whatever means it mabye". The same can be said of Papua New Guinea. Let John Howard be a real man and demonstrate to us that he has the nerve to stand up against what it matters the most. After all, West Papua is just at the nothern tip of Australia. Cowards talk big but coil their tails when it matters most. Posted by Forever Optimist PNGean, Thursday, 26 October 2006 2:55:56 PM
| |
Perseus forgot to mention the PRE-EXISTING United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514
see http://fandom.net/InfoKit/Src/unga1514.html "1. The subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation. 2. All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. 3. Inadequacy of political, economic, social or educational preparedness should never serve as a pretext for delaying independence. 4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected. 5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom. 6. Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. 7. All States shall observe faithfully and strictly the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the present Declaration on the basis of equality, non-interference in the internal affairs of all States, and respect for the sovereign rights of all peoples and their territorial integrity." Leigh asks about genocide which is a legal term, see the Yale University Law School report http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/westpapuahrights.pdf George Bush gets money from Bechtel and Freeport McMoRan in West Papua, guess why the US is now funding the TNI. Guess why West Papua got colonised in the 1960s. Posted by Daeron, Thursday, 26 October 2006 4:52:10 PM
| |
LOL, yet another Australian clown trying to provoke Australia to wage aggressive war against the great peace-loving country of Indonesia.
West Papua is an integral part of Indonesia according to the iron will of Indonesian people. Additionally, this integration is already acknowledged by two UN resolutions and the entire international community. There is simply nothing weakling and third-rate country Australia can do to change this fact. At best, you can scream begging for our attention until your throats are dry, but I don't think Indonesians would even bother noticing your provocations. Even the tiny Solomon Islands enjoy snubbing their collective noses on the powerless Australians lol. Remember, the mighty Indonesian people will never relinquish even one inch of its land forever. The heroic Indonesian people are always ready to sacrifice ourselves to our last drop of blood to defend our territory. We will enjoy cutting-off the ears and drinking the blood of any invaders you dare to touch their dirty feet on our sacred soil. On the other hand, there is one fraction of this otherwise lunatic diatrabe that is true: the cruel genocide and land-theft committed by criminal whites against the Aborigines. There is only one solution to this gross violation of human rights: RETURN AUSTRALIA TO ABORIGINES NOW!! Posted by Proud to be Indonesian, Thursday, 26 October 2006 10:06:57 PM
|
Article 1 states, "All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development".
There is no mention, anywhere in this covenant, nor in the Australian version of the treaty, for this right to be subject to the approval of any existing dominant power.
It should also be pointed out that prior to Federation, the approval of the existing state was not required for the formation of new states in Australia as well. Every community had the right to petition the crown for the grant of new colony status for the "peace, order, and good governance" of that community.
Without this right, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania and New Zealand would all still be run from Sydney as the original entity that has never willingly relinquished power over any territory under it's control. This power of the crown to recognise a "greater good" that should prevail over the self interests of existing government elites was only excluded from the Federal Constitution at the behest of the Brisbane based colonial government of Qld under threat of remaining outside the new Commonwealth.
Consequently, there is absolutely no moral basis for the Australian government to pursue a policy towards West Papuan independence that is contrary to both international legal principles and a key element of the Westminster system