Women appearing in printed pornography aren't always paid, some are trafficked or otherwise coerced, so buying that pornography literally does fund sexual slavery. You don't know which? You ever think to ask or try to find out, or you just focus on the jerkoff? You're buying it lads, you're responsible.

Add that many females in online porn are underage or very close to it (and some are also trafficked), and you have a training program for paedophilia. You're buying it lads, you're responsible, and you're making excuses. How typical of men.

Liam said 'how typical of men'.

Well we know for certain that Germaine Greer didn't approach the adolescent boys she displayed nude photos of in her pedarist manual. Then she went on and on lusting after their 'rivers of sperm' and opined that the age of 'consent' should be 10 or 12 years. Of course she didn't really think that their consent was really necessary, because she would be their sexual teacher. Interesting that feminists didn't complain about Greer's aberrant behaviour. Feminists invented the double standard.

As for nude photos and and girls, what about all the pornographic photos of girls in lesbian sites and magazines?

Women have nude photos of men in their magazines and they go to strip tease - which from all accounts are raunchy affairs with women throwing used underwear on stage and propositioning the performers afterwards.