The Forum > Article Comments > Embryos versus soldiers > Comments
Embryos versus soldiers : Comments
By Ben McNeil, published 8/9/2006If politicians supported the moral argument for war then they must also support the moral argument for stem cell research.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
Sorry for my very sloppy language, that was very misleading of me and I didn't mean to imply "cure" on purpose. Perhaps this statement best summarises what I meant to say
"Based on the published science, there are 72 maladies for which human patients have received some benefit (which is not the same as being ‘cured’) from adult stem cell or umbilical cord blood interventions. Meanwhile, embryonic stem cells have yet to demonstrate any human therapeutic use" by Wesley J. Smith.
Look I'm not against stem cell research, I think adult stem cell research is great and I think embryonic stem cell research, where the embryo is not harmed, is great too. I'm just wary of the idea of all-out embryonic stem cell research on the assumption that one day we'll be able to cure a lot of diseases.
I think the issue of when life begins is complicated, but I personally believe an embryo is a life, so I don't like the idea of terminating one human life on the possibility of saving another.
We can respectfully disagree though.