The Forum > Article Comments > Censoring debate > Comments
Censoring debate : Comments
By Gemma Connell, published 7/7/2006It's the cause, not the consequence, of the recent alleged sexual harassment on 'Big Brother' that matters.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Page 13
-
- All
Despite what often appears as being "angry", please let me assure you that it's all a facade. Mostly, I sit at the keyboard with a big grin from ear to ear, chuckling. I like stirring things up. I like making people taste their own medicine. I'm innately interested in justice and fair play, but have observed that whilst one half of the world plays fairly and by the rules, the other half do not - men/women, right/left, religious/non religious, etc.
My tactics are also simple - role reverse. Put the same unfair argument back the other way.
I use the same methods as the unfair, the unjust and the inconsiderate. Naturally, I seem rude, arrogant and angry. I'm simply creating a reflection for others to see themselves. But hey, that's my little secret. I just have fun stirring the pot of those whose pots need stirring, and in the same manner as they stir other's pots. Hence, Scout's correctly observed irony about "Neanderthal". In fact that entire post was irony if one cares to read it carefully. It was exactly what it accused others of.
In real life I am a very different person of course. I write from my brain, not my heart. My expressions are not necessarily my own personal beliefs. I like to counter mainstream assumptions like this article by Gemma Connell and challenge similar political rhetoric - which of course tries to "Censor Debate" by telling you what you should think instead of inviting you to think about it.
Anyway, I don't care what anyone thinks about me or my methods, I don't apologise for them, but I do know that they do work and since I began four years ago, they have been not insignificant in influencing directions, both locally and overseas in a small way.