The Forum > Article Comments > Cross the party line and you are out > Comments
Cross the party line and you are out : Comments
By Scott Prasser, published 19/6/2006History is against a solo bid by Cate Molloy: few who leave a major party win as independents.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
-
- All
Posted by Steve Madden, Thursday, 6 July 2006 2:58:55 PM
| |
Steve,
Perhaps Cate Molloy is making a leadership challenge? That would make an interesting turn of events politically. After all it is Peter Beattie who is not acting according to labour policies or his promises at the last election which helped him to be voted to office. Anyway why would Cate resign? I agree that she should force Beattie to chuck her out. Good on you Cate for having the courage to face this tyrant! Posted by Marsketa, Thursday, 6 July 2006 10:28:41 PM
| |
Again Steve,
I too live in Coolum. I work throughout the Noosa electorate. My neighbours and the customers I talk to all agree with Cate Molloy in condemning this dam. Even water greedy Brisbane people must see that it is not a solution to their water problem. Beattie orchestrated this to not be another "Koala corridor". Wayne Goss was brought down because he tried to do this in a labour electorate. Beattie has cleverly calculated that Gympie is not a labour area. He has ignored other dam sites in Labour areas such as Glasshouse. The Government would have calculated that they had already lost Gympie and probably Noosa as well. Cate has a better chance as an independant standing against the dam. As a labour candidate she could not have won the next election. Posted by Marsketa, Friday, 7 July 2006 10:16:37 PM
| |
When I first heard that Labour had a new candidate for Noosa electorate I asked just one question. WHO?
Posted by Marsketa, Wednesday, 12 July 2006 9:48:25 PM
| |
Daggett,
Point taken with a sinking feeling just-to-realise that the role-model conscientious citizen's stance taken for the Jew-lesser brethren survival in the Ghetto Australis, contrary to the silver-tongued Zionists usurpation of an entire Jewish race, has been written-off simply "as virtually indecipherable form of a concept except-for-being some sort of anti-Jewish-rant". So much for the wishful thinking on my part, possibly kidding myself to envisage OLO forum to be a very unique place where astute people are welcomed to practice participatory democracy, vitally pertinent on the local issues as-much-as exchange logical interpretations as to the mayhem afflicted world, and thus seek constructive solutions. Encompassing a long overdue resolution to the vicious impasse (to-be or not-to-be) faced by our Jew-lesser brethren. Who as a matter of fact, were utterly unrepresented by the parasitic Zionists. In turn utilising us solely as a human shield, to traverse Zionist sown-calamities. Having said that, in no time would I deliberately ignore the prevailing discipline, bearing in mind that the initially mentioned by me elders-of-zion (solely as a power behind the throne), were exploited in a malicious way by the veteran forum user. Who relentlessly challenged me far beyond the original topic's extent, while disputing blueprint of the world hegemony. Thus provoking me to substantiate my reasoning, exposing Zionism's sordid annals. At the time when I was eager to contribute towards the participatory democracy notion, precisely within this thread's topic: "Cross the Party Line and You Are Out". Which became so ironically a very meaningful in my circumstances of being suspended with my arms wrestled-back for 168 hours, without any means of reply to the malicious finger pointing at me, and so caustically emitted condemnation across-the-board (tantamount to browbeating), to the effect that my "contributions are, above of, all untrue, libellous and deeply offensive to all Jewish people". In accordance with the frivolous allegations emission, which without any doubt were accomplished in a typical Zionist chutzpah style. Daring to voice judgmental bias in a patronising tone ..."on behalf of all the Jewish people". As to the diminished democracy exposé, please proceed to ... http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=4625#47660 Posted by Leo Braun, Thursday, 13 July 2006 4:00:21 PM
| |
An election called full term will make it harder for Cate Molloy to win the Noosa electorate as an independant. She would do best if an election were called sooner than later whilst the DAM issue is still fresh in people's minds and befor the new Labour Candidate gets to meet and greet with the electorate. At the moment he is an unknown in the community. He doesn't go to the local school fetes and the Scout whatevers. He hasn't gotten riding tracks in State Forests for the horsy crowd etc. Cate has given 110% support for locals in this community.
Posted by Marsketa, Friday, 14 July 2006 8:47:58 PM
|
We agree on something (big grin).
Back on topic, Cate Molloy is now calling for Peter Beattie to resign while still not resigning herself.
If the Mary Dam is so important why was she absent from the Dam announcement on Wednesday?
Cate its your time to resign, give a real polly a go.