The Forum > Article Comments > Victory - what victory? > Comments
Victory - what victory? : Comments
By Melinda Tankard Reist, published 24/2/2006Celebrating women's choice to abort with a drinks party.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Your pitiful abuse of the English language, asserts on its reading that I have suggested the partner has a right of decision in the matter of a woman’s right to abort.
I will repeat my view so even a drongo will understand
A womans right to decide on abortion is her right and her right alone.
No other person nor institution has any right to expect to make the decision for her or against her.
No other person or institution means
Not a parent (except in the case of minors who are deemed not to have developed the cognitive skills to make decisions in their own best interest)
Not another family member
Not a church or religion
Not government or agency of government
In the normal course of events not the partner – by which I mean, if the woman is aware of her surroundings and cognitive, then she but if she is unconscious, comatose with no anticipated date for awakening or chronically deranged, then her partner should speak for her and in the absence of her partner, only then her parents. In the absence of partner and parents, her doctor should decide what is in his patients best medical interest.
Never ever the state and never ever some bunch of religious zealots masquerading as “concerned citizens “.
That is my view which
I am happy to debate with anyone.
As for apology - none due and none will be given.