The Forum > Article Comments > I hope David Hicks is patient > Comments
I hope David Hicks is patient : Comments
By John Andrewartha, published 30/1/2006John Andrewartha argues it is time justice was done for David Hicks.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
You are implying that traitor Hicks is facing criminal charges in Australia, and that the only reason he has not been charged is because our entrepreneurial, ambulance chasing legal system is unable to get at him. Pray tell, exactly which charges is traitor Hicks facing? Did he have some outstanding traffic fines?
Hicks is an illegal combatant and irregular soldiers, even those who fight with the sanction of recognised governments, have no legal protection at all. Neither civilian nor miliary. There have been attempts by third world countries to give irregular, guerrilla forces the status of POW’s when captured, but civilised countries will not have a bar of it. Professional, regular soldiers will never agree that people who wear civilian clothes and who can use this cover to shoot uniformed soldiers in the back, are fellow soldiers worthy of equal status.
Your brother is half right when he claims that Australian troops did not sink to the level of the Japs during WW2. But the fact remains that Australian, and every other Allied military force threw out the rules book when dealing with the Japs. Australian soldiers routinely executed wounded and helpless Jap soldiers. If you have never been aware of this before, it is obviously because you have never bothered to read a single book on the war in the South Pacific.
It is interesting that you brought up the subject of the movie, Dirty Harry. I have reached an age where violent movies involving extreme violence, car cases, explosions and the glamourisation of criminal behaviour seem ridiculous and childish. To me, a great movie uses it’s storyline to investigate the boundaries of moral principles. Dirty Harry was an example of this. The storyline involved a police officer who was more concerned with protecting his community than observing moribund legal principles which seemed only concerned with protecting the rights of criminals. The success of the movie was a reflection of public disenchantment with a legal system which is no longer working to protect the community.