The Forum > Article Comments > Compromising our freedom of speech > Comments
Compromising our freedom of speech : Comments
By Syed Atiq ul Hassan, published 5/1/2006Syed Atiq ul Hassan argues sedition laws may damage the image of Australia internationally
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
Posted by Arjay, Sunday, 8 January 2006 11:21:10 PM
| |
Oh deary me Arjay, Do you really want me to respond to this effort? I'm sure others do but I'm kinda bored with analysing your pathetic racisms and paranoid fears and least of all your comic book political opinions. You've got to read more broadly than playboys and the sunday papers Arjay, theres a whole world of theory and history waiting for you.
Heres a picture of me for you to look at mate! Its an old one but it shows my best side! http://www.pg.com/science/haircare/hair_twh_36/hair_twh_36_02.jpg Posted by Rainier, Monday, 9 January 2006 9:31:45 PM
| |
Rainer.Yes,the picture of the Old Aborigine is something to respect,since he was a true warrior but the present day pretenders have lost the plot,just like many of our Anglo trendies.
Posted by Arjay, Monday, 9 January 2006 10:14:04 PM
| |
Arjay, you are right about respecting the old Aboriginal warrior. I respect him more than the drunken and stoned goons we saw defiling the Australian flag at Cronulla. I can only imagine what Christ would have done to these looneys. Perhaps something similar to what he did to the money changers ...
Then again, Christ was of Middle Eastern appearance. So he might have been hit by a beer bottle before lifting a finger ... Posted by Irfan, Monday, 9 January 2006 10:52:01 PM
| |
Irfan, the "drunken and stoned goons" wouldn't have been there, if not for years of abuse and intimidation by Lebanese gangsters, and their assault on two lifeguards.
These Lebanese gangsters should all go back to their countries of origin, bacause they are incapable of assimilating and contributing anything positive to Western civilisation. Your constant focus on the Anglo-Celtic reaction to the Lebanese provocations shows that you are biased. What about the events AFTER the Cronulla riots as well? Or do you consider the rampage and destruction of property by the Lebanese gangs to be fully justified, as well as their prior provocations? Posted by Froggie, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 2:04:25 PM
| |
Froggie
The armchair defender of our freedoms won't answer those questions. He simply can't. Posted by keith, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 3:10:51 PM
|
Basically Rainer you are a hypocrite.You talk of presenting unbiased history to your students yet never mention like most of your lefty mates how the Aborigines treated each other prior European settlement.The Aborigines were involved with their own murderous tribal warfare over land and resources just like the Eurpoeans.It was influenza that killed more Aborigines than any bullets.
So don't give us this nonsense of the noble oppressed savage.You like most Aborigines Rainer have more Anglo genes than Aboriginal.It suites many Anglo Aborigines to be the victimised down trodden receivers of sit down money which has insidiously destroyed them.
As I've said previously,the Romans and Vikings invaded England so get used to it."What did the Romans ever do for us?"Remember the quote from "The Life of Brian"?