A "shakedown" it is. A shakedown by some tarts who use their natural attributes to make a living, and saw an opportunity to make extra money out of some immature boofheads who believe their own legends. It's impossible to decide which of the two groups is the worst. Neither should be given the attention they are getting from the salacious media.

Salacious = not merely telling you something indecent, but presenting it in a way that encourages you to take pleasure in knowing the indecent details.

My daily Telegraph is on-board with this story obsessively; it’s where all the sporty people of life’s understanding go for their “updates”! ho ho.

And no, Im not inconsistent, all my newspaper reading is of those I find discarded in the garbages around town…their free, and so they should be.

as usual these silly drunk footballers triggered the power hungry liberal left women to sprout their concern for women. The same week these mean girls defended their PM objectivising women they pretended offense that prostitutes were paid only for 3 slaps of bare backsides rather than four. The sisterhood, emasculated males and pathetically woke afl were happy to throw 4 silly footballers under the boss to appease the unappeasable. This blinded feminist would not even entertain the fact that dancing around naked in front of 4 drunk men is objectifying women.

Hi DD,

"All my newspaper reading is of those I find discarded in the garbages around town...while scabbing the odd fag butt, or the dregs from a unfinished bottle of booze!"

Okay DD, I understand where you're coming from. times are tough, not that you'ed notice.

As for these overpaid footy dudes, who are nothing more than a distraction for the masses in the form of menial entertainment. TOO BAD, SO SAD! I'm still cracking up about the Anglican Dean of Brisbane with all them call girls in his Cathedral. With a please explain from the Arch Bishop. Archy Pell will never be dead while ever there are blokes in dog collars!

I somehow cannot dredge up a lot of sorrow for this situation.
There are supercharged men, and women of doubt, in the same strange place.
If these women put themselves in those strange places, strange things can happen to them.
Remember that 'those who live funny die funny'.
I somehow cannot be overly concerned by the adverse outcome of a situation they generated together.
And the women contributed by being part of any action.
So they must all be responsible for any 'damage'.
But am I prejudging this?
Is it yet to be decided if 'foul play' were involved?

Hi IF,

What are ""women in doubt"? Trannies? Come to think of it what are "supercharged men"? Are they like muscle cars? Rip roaring and ready to go. "strange things can happen" Generally they're not so strange, more of the horizontal things!

"who live funny die funny" Shakespeare? Or Ronald McDonald?

"if 'foul play' were involved?" More like fore play than any foul play. Maybe the lads should have stuck to their swannies and left the girls alone. I'm still going nuts about the Dean in the Cathedral around the corner, with all the call girls. All this moralistic judgemental nonsense, its a crack up!