The Forum > Article Comments > The moral myth of the first strike > Comments
The moral myth of the first strike : Comments
By Yuri Koszarycz, published 13/4/2026Pre-emptive war does not defend peace. It destroys the moral ground on which peace depends.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All


The "pre-emptive" strike on Iran occurred only after Iran's 47 year ongoing war via its support for terror all over the world, by a religion that doesn't work on Christian morals, or any morals at all. It should have happened much earlier.
There are all sorts of good things in the Bible. ‘Loving your enemy’, and ‘turning the other cheek’ are not the good sorts; particularly when it comes to a religion determined to kill and subjugate as many Christians, and other non-Muslims to get what it wants: world domination.
Bible-bashing and naive academics won't save the West. That's a job for hard men with a normal sense of self-preservation.
The “dignity of life” is an excuse used here to say no to war. Tell that to Muslims, who love death.
Then there's the nonsense of sitting on our hands, and not reacting to “a scary story about what might happen”. How long has Yuri Koszarycz had his head in the sand!
Using Christianity at all as an excuse to do nothing is pointless. It is on the way out, along with the West itself. King Charles 111 would rather talk about Ramadan than give the traditional Easter Message. He even tried to have his title Defender Of The Faith (the Church of England) changed to Defender of (all) Faiths. Wiser heads than his put a stop to that nonsense. And the next plonker to the throne, is a personality-free nothing even more woke and useless than his daddy.
If you believe in God, thank him for Donald Trump and the hard young men who surround him. They are the West's only hope.