Dear Canem Malum (Bad Dog),

You have just shown your true colours:
You don't like to be ruled by others who are unlike yourself,
yet you are more than happy to rule over them.

Specifically, you would like the institutions of your particular cultural ethnicity to have sovereignty over the other people you share this earth with.

Nobody ever asked you not to have a strong family or a grass root parish community. Nobody denied your freedom to determine your own principles - but will you be content to live your life peacefully according to them without trying to impose them on others outside your family and parish community?

Are Marxist's pointing at Trump and saying Authoritarian... Classic Marxist DARVO (Deny And Reverse Victim and Offender). Trump is trying to save American jobs, this is about giving American power over their own future, and someone who seems to sound like a Marxist is calling this Authoritarianism and saying that this should stop. These Marxist's should be treated as traitors in my view. Marxist's seem to be giving away America's birthright inheritance to foreigners, evil nihilist's. Marxist's seemingly spend other peoples money and call it justice.

perhaps you like to provide some examples?
Yuyutsu,
America, Europe, Australia bleat & spruik about being Democracies yet they allow themselves to be dictated to by LGBT, Woke & migrant splinter groups & religious factions. I'm dismayed you even had to ask for evidence.

Dear Indyvidual,

Your original statement was:
«Democracy has allowed too many minority groups to dictate !»

So then I asked for examples and you listed: "LGBT, Woke & migrant splinter groups & religious factions".

While there are awful plenty of ways the state and its government, may they be banished to a place where the sun does not shine, dictate me, I can't see how specifically any of the above minorities you mentioned is dictating me and my life and in what way(s).

Also, there's no such thing as "allowing oneself to be dictated":
what you seem to describe instead, are agreements, give and take, negotiating "I will give you what's most important for you and you give me what's most important for me". This is a healthy discourse and not dictatorial in the least.

But let me get back to your original statement:
You say that there are "too many" minority groups allowed to dictate -
does that mean that a few minority groups should still be allowed to dictate, as long as there are not too many of them?
Or does it mean that majority groups should be allowed to dictate?

As I already said, this is our life and nobody whatsoever should be able to dictate to us how we live!

If, however, we freely choose to join a society, then we willingly bind ourselves to the give-and-take discourse within it. Practically everyone in a given society is a member of not one, but several minorities pertaining to different aspects of life - and all these minorities should be able to live in harmony together, that assuming that they joined the society in question voluntarily (which obviously is not the case, neither in Australia nor in any other country).

Given that you so dislike the minorities you mentioned, I must ask you why you agreed to remain in the same society with them, and if you haven't agreed (and likely neither did they agree to be with you) then why not explore ways to separate, so you both can be happy and not dictate to each other?

I'll stand with the Neo-Nazi's on this one Yuyutsu and say 2 words
'Israel Lobby'.

Most Western Traditionalist's tend to isolationism, but when they get office see that it's important to provide some limited skeletal structure to the international community to avoid a decline into chaos. So no Traditionalist's don't want to rule over others, but feel compelled to limit the expansion of corruption.

Sometimes difficult decisions need to be made, for example with oil, in order to secure the world, sometimes mistakes are made, and sometimes individuals and individual companies go off script.

Joseph Nye talked about the soft power of setting the example.

Perhaps it's time that Western Traditionalist's took their hand off the tiller and let the chaotic elements have their way for a while, to remind other nations that while management can be sort of authoritarian, chaos is worse. Management also has reverted to Marxist Managerialism as James Burnham warned.

Yuyutsu said "Nobody ever asked you not to have a strong family or a grass root parish community. Nobody denied your freedom to determine your own principles"

Answer- Governments in the Anglosphere have stopped Anglo-Celtic people from restricting other ethnicities entry to their communities under multiple jurisdictions, under the auspicies of anti-prejudice laws, but these laws are themselves prejudiced against Anglo-Celtics, this will end in the Replacement of Anglo-Celtic people. But I suppose that Woke/ Progressive/ Marxism is happy with genocide as long as it's themselves that is executing it.

Anti-prejudice laws are a perverse artifact of our age, that will result in our extinction. But I suppose Paul1405 and Yuyutsu is happy with that. What if it was their children??

Anti-prejudice laws demostrate the truth of the principle of the human condition, "whatever we do, we know that we will fail and die", and some problems remain no matter which direction we travel. Good fences make good neighbours.

Rather than offering unlimited refuge in the west to all peoples, perhaps those seeking refuge need to fix their native countries, or aren't they strong enough. They can't be dependent on us forever, destroying the west won't create long term happiness, children and baby birds eventually need to leave the nest.