The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Why facts (voters) can’t get a look-in against ‘Huge Australia’ groupthink > Comments

Why facts (voters) can’t get a look-in against ‘Huge Australia’ groupthink : Comments

By Stephen Saunders, published 21/3/2024

The dominating ‘Huge Australia’ stakeholders are a diverse lot. United however, by false immigration narratives that railroad voters. Almost impossible to counter, in woke Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Yup.
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Thursday, 21 March 2024 9:52:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Eight billion and counting....
When will we ever come to our senses and accept that the only problem we have is too many of us!!
Posted by ateday, Thursday, 21 March 2024 2:42:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
No need to worry, our Glorious Labor Government is doing deals with Uncle Xi as we speak. New South Guangdong will welcome in many hundreds of thousands of Chinese immigrants per year...meanwhile all "good Aussies" will get an all expenses paid sea voyage back to their new, plushly appointed accommodation in one of the many vacant "cities" around China- with a course of their choice in "re-education" subjects alongside a Uhigur comrade.
Posted by Albie Manton in Darwin, Thursday, 21 March 2024 3:25:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
they're new supporters of Labor.
Maverick,
Been saying that since Day 1. That trade started in the Goaf days ! Enclaves are now the sponges of Govt funding.
Posted by Indyvidual, Monday, 25 March 2024 7:50:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
No, we do not have have high immigration, but high temporary border movements or churn over counted under the UNPD defined NOM (inflated in 2006), predominantly students who are temporary residents, deemed net financial contributors e.g. GST, then majority depart; free money.

Conversely, like the comments section here, the permanent population is ageing and creating population growth through longevity and tugging on budgets more, but we are about to enter 'the big die off' for two decades cleaning up the oldies and boomers, 5 million.

Optimum or balanced population numbers by mid century, or is it qualitative issues?
Posted by Andras Smith, Monday, 25 March 2024 7:02:54 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Everybody in Australia, except "Andras" Smith, works with the Treasury/ABS definition of net migration, and accepts that we have high migration. The final figure for 2022-23 is 548,000, thrashing the previous record by well over 200,000. The momentum has barely flagged, in 2023-24.

But the Treasurer claims last week that he is taking "quite substantial action" to "put downward pressure" on migration. Even by his debased standards, the most extraordinary lie
Posted by Steve S, Tuesday, 26 March 2024 1:17:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy