A peer reviewed study did find some mild to serious side effects in a few individuals. Around 7 in 1,000. And hardly a catastrophe, giving the lives that were surely saved. Since then, further studies have shown that the vaccine may in fact cure cancer.
Alan B.

The peer reviewed study didn't/couldn't eliminate already existing but undiagnosed, health conditions.
Alan B.

How they count covid cases https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF6Wz7rypdU

How low can COVID-19 catastrophists go?

From the study:
"In this study including more than 99 million people vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, the risk up to 42 days after vaccination was generally similar to the background risk for the majority of outcomes; however, a few potential safety signals were identified."

For rates of venous thromboembolic events: an excess rate of 2.5 events per 100,000 vaccinations.

For myocarditis : 4–7 excess events in 28 days per 100,000 vaccinees.

Do the Maths, these are very low percentages even assuming that these 99 million people all had the same base health indicators before vaccination.

A recent Swiss study showed that myocarditis cases after Moderna Covid vaccination were mild and temporary.


This latest study concludes: "....our study confirmed previously identified rare safety signals following COVID-19 vaccination and contributed evidence on several other important outcomes."

Barry Young, a former employee of New Zealand’s Ministry of Health, who has a Masters in Science, has risked going to prison for seven years for releasing anonymised information from a Government database which he helped build.

This data identifies COVID-19 vaccine batch numbers and the corresponding deaths of individuals within a very close timeframe of receiving their dose of the immunisation. The data he presents shows that some batch numbers had a fatality rate of up to 21.38%.
"Perfectly safe and effective?" https://didyouknow.ink/whistleblower-reveals-covid-19-vaccine-death-rates/

Excellent article!

Despite the concerted censorship of alternate viewpoints, confirmation of the harms of mRNA vaccines is increasingly filtering through.

One article I've read recently includes compelling photos of fibrous blood clots in the dead bodies of mRNA recipients, a phenomenon which embalmers had never seen prior to the Covid vaccine rollout.

"In a recent survey of 269 embalmers across four major countries and three continents, more than 70% reported finding strange fibrous white blood clots in significant percentages of corpses in 2023 — clots they were not finding pre-pandemic. A similar survey conducted in late 2022 revealed that 66% of embalmers began finding the unusual clots in mid-2021, suggesting a temporal link to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, which began earlier that year." https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/blood-clots-embalmers-report-mid-2021-covid-vaccines

It is not a "flat earth" position to question the safety of vaccines that were rushed into production and never properly tested. The pharmaceutical companies profiting from these vaccines have such a control over health advisory bodies that only blind believers would accept their recommendations at face value. It is a perfectly valid and prudent response to examine the Big Pharma money trail and scrutinise the obscene levels of untrammelled profiteering involved in the vaccine industry. And the more one reads, the more one sees the need for caution.