The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Why we said 'NO bloody way' > Comments

Why we said 'NO bloody way' : Comments

By John Mikkelsen, published 18/10/2023

Even in the closing stages, while sitting in the red dust at the foot of Uluru swatting flies and swallowing a few, Albo refused to swallow the latest poll figures.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
Dear Indyvidual,

«Are you listening to yourself ? How could Dutton possibly stand by his promise with that result ?»

A promise is a promise - he should not have made such a promise in the first place.

Alternately he could have promised: "If the result is going to be close then I will call for another referendum" - but he didn't.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Thursday, 19 October 2023 8:09:53 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Virtually all the process was done under the Liberal government from Uluru up to the referendum council.
SteeleRedux & Yuyutsu,
Under but not with, the with was Labor !
Posted by Indyvidual, Thursday, 19 October 2023 9:47:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Indyvidual,

Why did you address your last post also to me?

I said nothing about processes and political parties, nor do I care about any of them - all I wrote was that promises ought to be kept.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Friday, 20 October 2023 8:02:25 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yuyutsu,
Your argument is just so typical of why things are so difficult. Do you approve of the money spent for this Voice debacle & do you want more wasted ?
Or, would you rather waste no more funding on a meaningless argument about changing a policy which now has no more relevance ? I'm sure Dutton would stick to the original suggestion to hold another referendum if the outcome were to have been so close that it would cause too much unrest. As it turned out there is no need to waste anymore time & money on a closed case !
We have the NIAA & if they can't do their job, dismantle them along with other useless but expensive sections of Departments !
Posted by Indyvidual, Saturday, 21 October 2023 6:48:48 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Indyvidual,

Of course I am unhappy with that hassle of referendum - especially with all those disturbing "Vote YES" placards that distract drivers and must have caused that many road accidents and domestic violence.

But I rather live in a world where promises are kept.

As for the expenses, sure it's a waste, but no promise was made to have campaigns, so even while keeping promises we could at least have had a campaign-less referendum!

What is "NIAA"? While I don't know what it means, I would indeed like it dismantled along all other government sections and departments.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Saturday, 21 October 2023 9:57:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What is "NIAA"?
Yuyutsu,
I'm glad you asked, it's literally the same as the advisory part of the Voice only turbo-charged & utterly unaffordable in every which way !
Posted by Indyvidual, Sunday, 22 October 2023 5:36:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy