Thanks for the non science/non academic feedback, but you seem more intent on suggesting, as the article above does, conspiracy but who is the expert?

If it's not conspiracy and it's academically credible, where is the support from other academics etc. or other peer reviewed articles with similar findings?

Finally, no disrespect intended towards Mr. Hunter, but according to his bio, business is more his area of expertise, not Covid related epidemiology? If qualified with expertise on the latter, then there maybe more credibility?

Andras Smith

<< Thanks for the non science/non academic feedback >>

Wow, your arrogance springs from a very deep well!

The point I am making is that the general public should be allowed to consider all contributions to the vaccine debate, instead of missing out on exposure to views that have been censored by those such as yourself who think they know better.

I'm pretty certain this is the point Murray is making too, though I wouldn't presume to speak on his behalf. I don't need to be a scientist or an academic to make this point. And nor does Murray.

Why shouldn't alternative views be published and allowed to stand up to scientific, academic and public scrutiny? Again I ask, what are you so afraid of?

Wellness Company Chief Scientific Officer Dr Peter McCullough is now saying that Covid vaccines contain "Cancer virus" in an interview with that well-known scientific expert Alex Jones, of InfoWars. Dr Makis is shouting about "TURBO-Cancers!" with Shannon Joy on Rumble. No, I'm not making it up, have a look at the Wellness Company's Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/twccanada.health

So if your idea of an authoritative source is Alex Jones and you get your health advice from Rumble, Substack or TikTok you might believe this nonsense. Perhaps Murray Hunter might explain why he though this story was credible?

'Why shouldn't alternative views be published and allowed to stand up to scientific, academic and public scrutiny? Again I ask, what are you so afraid of?'

See Johnj's comment.

Just to be clear on what the paper is saying.

In about 3/4 of autopsis of people suspected of dying from complications of the covid vaccines the patient had a high probability of having died from the covid vaccine.

Or put another way, about a 1/4 of autopsies on people suspected of dying from the vaccine found a high probability of another cause.

No one claims medical interventions and drugs and vaccines don't cause side effects up to and including deaths. The key is in the prospective assessment risks and benefits.

I can't comment on the censoring - but censoring is always worrying.

But the theme that 3/4 of all deaths at the moment are from the vaccine is just not what the paper says.