Censorship at work. There are too many bigwigs who took away our freedoms during covid to let the truth out.

Well done, Murray Hunter and OLO!

The media, the government, Big Pharma and the science and medical establishment have all made such a concerted effort to shut down and ridicule all dissenting voices, no matter how well-informed and highly-credentialed, that it's now almost impossible to present any red flags or criticism of vaccines. Censorship is so complete that the general public is basically ignorant of the growing body of evidence indicating deep-seated health problems and rising numbers of excess deaths resulting from the experimental mRNA COVID vaccines.

For those of you who seek the truth and who don't like having information withheld from you, try and read from people like Dr Joseph Mercola and Robert Kennedy Jr who despite being heavily censored do work hard to maintain a very worthwhile online presence. Edward Dowd's "Cause unknown: The epidemic of sudden deaths in 2021 and 2022" is an easy read to start with and quite possibly available at your local library.

And for those of you who resisted the huge ongoing pressure to get yourself injected with an mRNA COVID vaccine, rest easy in knowing you made a wise decision!

The 'governmentS' Bromwyn, with the 'S' to denote plural.

Stupid modern Uniparty.
2 wings of the same bird.
Usually, when something smells of 'bipartisan'
No-one wins, but the people lose.

And for those of you who resisted the huge ongoing pressure to get yourself injected with an mRNA COVID vaccine, rest easy in knowing you made a wise decision!

Yep that's me btw!
I copped the guilt, the shame and the abuse.
- Unvaxxed and proud -

ttbn,
If bigwigs drove covid then those bigwigs are destroying the world economy.
Why?
What for?
For what possible gain?

JF

Control. They are destroying yours and my economy, not their own. There were 500 extra billionaires created by Covid.

ttbn

What do they get out of that control that is positive?

I think everyone will suffer, many are already due to food being unaffordable or unavailable. Ocean essential protein food supply is presently not sustainable.

Disease thrives with malnutrition, already in numerous countries, including where a virus can more easily mutate.

Disease spreads, including into the homes of bigwigs

This article implies Covid conspiracy without evidence or based on an article that did not appear in a journal?

'Within 24 hours, the study was removed with a message stating "This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology."

This is very strange as the peer review process itself, is the method usually utilized to determine issues, as the Lancet's statement announced.'

More about confusing OLO readers than explaining the science, process and issues?

Been a long time since I’ve posted here, but this article is so preposterous I can’t resist. Roger Hodkinson, William Makis and Peter A McCullough have claimed everything from “Covid-19 is a hoax”, to spruiking Ivermectin and Hydroxychloraquine. They now trade as the Wellness Company (Hodkinson is Chief Pathologist) that sells supplements said to protect patients from "toxic spike proteins”. So they have a vested interest in disparaging Covid vaccines. They put a bodgy paper on a preprint server, which was promptly booted due to obvious flaws in its methodology. Then they can scream CENSORSHIP!! while promoting their quack cures. But feel free to order your Nattokinase from the Wellness Company.

Haven’t heard of Nattokinase? Don’t worry, you will.

Some covidologists seem very defensive.

Dr McCullough is now spouting about autism. I have no doubt he will come up with a “miracle cure” shortly.

Get your Nattokinase here, only $65.99: https://www.twc.health/products/long-haul-formula

Andras Smith

<< This article implies Covid conspiracy without evidence or based on an article that did not appear in a journal? >>

Murray Hunter's article did not mention or imply 'conspiracy' in any way. It was purely informing readers that a Lancet review of Covid-related autopsy findings had been taken down within 24 hours and before it could be subjected to the usual peer review process. Introducing the word 'conspiracy', when there was absolutely no reason to do so, is simply a lazy ploy on your part to try and discredit a view with which you disagree.

<< More about confusing OLO readers than explaining the science, process and issues? >>

What an arrogant and patronizing comment! No, we are not confused. We are interested in finding the truth behind 'the science, process and issues'. All views should be allowed to be subjected to rigorous scrutiny. Big Pharma and conventional medicine gurus are not the sole purveyors of truth ... far from it. Many professionals in various medical/scientific fields are studying the evidence and raising questions about the efficacy and longterm safety of mRNA COVID vaccines. And they should be perfectly entitled to do so. We can either shut them down, like you and others are attempting to do. Or we can allow their views to be heard and fairly tested in the public arena as they should be. If the views are as wacky and non-credible as you say they, with the light of day, that will soon become obvious. What are you so afraid of?

Thanks for the non science/non academic feedback, but you seem more intent on suggesting, as the article above does, conspiracy but who is the expert?

If it's not conspiracy and it's academically credible, where is the support from other academics etc. or other peer reviewed articles with similar findings?

Finally, no disrespect intended towards Mr. Hunter, but according to his bio, business is more his area of expertise, not Covid related epidemiology? If qualified with expertise on the latter, then there maybe more credibility?

Andras Smith

<< Thanks for the non science/non academic feedback >>

Wow, your arrogance springs from a very deep well!

The point I am making is that the general public should be allowed to consider all contributions to the vaccine debate, instead of missing out on exposure to views that have been censored by those such as yourself who think they know better.

I'm pretty certain this is the point Murray is making too, though I wouldn't presume to speak on his behalf. I don't need to be a scientist or an academic to make this point. And nor does Murray.

Why shouldn't alternative views be published and allowed to stand up to scientific, academic and public scrutiny? Again I ask, what are you so afraid of?

Wellness Company Chief Scientific Officer Dr Peter McCullough is now saying that Covid vaccines contain "Cancer virus" in an interview with that well-known scientific expert Alex Jones, of InfoWars. Dr Makis is shouting about "TURBO-Cancers!" with Shannon Joy on Rumble. No, I'm not making it up, have a look at the Wellness Company's Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/twccanada.health

So if your idea of an authoritative source is Alex Jones and you get your health advice from Rumble, Substack or TikTok you might believe this nonsense. Perhaps Murray Hunter might explain why he though this story was credible?

'Why shouldn't alternative views be published and allowed to stand up to scientific, academic and public scrutiny? Again I ask, what are you so afraid of?'

See Johnj's comment.

Just to be clear on what the paper is saying.

In about 3/4 of autopsis of people suspected of dying from complications of the covid vaccines the patient had a high probability of having died from the covid vaccine.

Or put another way, about a 1/4 of autopsies on people suspected of dying from the vaccine found a high probability of another cause.

No one claims medical interventions and drugs and vaccines don't cause side effects up to and including deaths. The key is in the prospective assessment risks and benefits.

I can't comment on the censoring - but censoring is always worrying.

But the theme that 3/4 of all deaths at the moment are from the vaccine is just not what the paper says.