The Forum > Article Comments > Religious freedom and the resurrection > Comments
Religious freedom and the resurrection : Comments
By Greg Bondar, published 28/3/2022'Just as it would be wrong to tell the Mardi Gras not to be gay, or to tell an ethnic body not to be ethnic, religious organisations must be allowed to remain religious in their guiding principles and practices.'
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
No I didn't say "Irrefutable evidence is required to establish belief", I prefaced that with the word "if", which gives a different meaning. No, a belief can be established on circumstantial or rater scanty evidence, even on an assumption. I don't deny your right to believe in a supernatural being, a sky father, a god or whatever, personally I am agnostic on that subject. I have spent most of my life exposed to Christianity and its teachings, and the believers with their beliefs are as diverse as the non-believers and their take on such things. BTW, what evidence have I not considered? Typical of believers is such evidence as; "The Sun rises in the mornings, I have no reason for that occurrence, so therefore I believe it must be the hand of God at work." A belief can be fact, but it can also be fiction, belief is not dependent on fact.
One for you to ponder, I can say I have met a god, a true and living god. Once time venturing into the Waipoua Forest in NZ, there I met the God Tane Mahuta, in the form of a giant kauri tree. To Maori people Tane Mahuta is as real and as significant as your God. I am not one to deny that belief. My question to you is; Do you accept that Tane Mahuta is as real and as significant to Maori people as your God is to you?