VK3AUU,

Dan was right. You are mad. Certainly unable to comprehend that because someone has "broad shoulders" if is not OK for a coward, knowing he can get away with it, to abuse a decent person.

ttbn

<< Certainly unable to comprehend that because someone has "broad shoulders" if is not OK for a coward, knowing he can get away with it, to abuse a decent person. >>

I agree with you, telling Graham to grow up and get a brain was indeed a juvenile and abusive comment.

Before you criticise the speck in another's eye, however, you need to first remove the plank in your own. You call out others for abuse and yet you yourself are quick to abuse when it suits. My support on another thread for Assange, for example, has seen you label me as 'naive' and a 'lowlife' and my opinion on his situation a 'manic blurt'. All these comments are personally abusive. Why call out abuse of Graham and yet continue to abuse me? Is it that Graham's status on this site counts and mine doesn't? Or is it that Graham is 'decent' and I'm not?

You've also demanded on that same thread that I provide sources and yet you yourself steadfastly refuse to do so. Apparently, that's because I claim to have some sort of 'special insight', which you of course, the ever-humble contributor, would never do! Your arrogant and patronising explanation to me on that thread clearly demonstrates the confused mental contortions you will stoop to. << As for what I post, I have given my OPINION on what I think should happen to Assange. Some people will agree with me, others will disagree with me. No problems with that. And I don't have to 'verify' my opinions. Nobody has to. But, when you claim to have special insights into everything, as you invariably do, you need to expect requests for proof. >>

When did I ever claim or imply that I have 'special insights into everything'?

I suggest you closely examine your hypocritical double standards and do something about them.

Dear Graham,
Congratulations on writing such a succinct and meaningful article. I agree strongly with all your assertions. I believe that Vaccine Mandates are morally and philosophically wrong and have no useful place in our churches.
James17.

Dear James17,

Why?

Our churches are among the most discriminatory places in our country and about to become even more so if Scomo gets his way.

It should be morally wrong for a non-vaxxed person to expect the rest of us to labour under restrictions with them.

Given that Graham didn't use a single scripture to support his stance I'm wondering if you had anything to back up your statement "that Vaccine Mandates are morally and philosophically wrong and have no useful place in our churches."

Something from Christ would be good but if not anything which clearly supports your stance.

Meanwhile in keeping with Isiah here is the next verse to the one I posted earlier. This really does speak to those who are gleaning their vaccine reluctance from facebook while disregarding those with far more expertise and experience.

"21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"

Forget Christ....I wanna see the big guy.....the one Moses conjured up when faced with a rebellion

And another conspiracy theorist succumbs :-(

https://news.in-24.com/news/436620.html