The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The Peter Ridd case is too important to be left to the courts > Comments

The Peter Ridd case is too important to be left to the courts : Comments

By Graham Young, published 2/7/2021

If Ridd loses, then, without remedial action by the government, academics become mere cyphers of their universities, unable to strenuously critique the work of their colleagues.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All
Hasbeen,

Peter Ridd has the support of Gina Rhineheart and the
fossil fuel industry. He has the support of wealthy
right-wing shock jocks like Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones,
the Institute of Public Affairs, and many other wealthy
donors. Do you really believe that it's a case of some
little bloke fighting the good fight? Ridd is also suing
for millions in compensation. I don't think you actually
believe what you just said.
Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 3 July 2021 1:25:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy's list of conservative commentators PROVES that the Reef is doomed.
Why not add everyone who appears on Sky News ?
Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 3 July 2021 1:34:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bazz,

If you know Prof. Ridd's other supporters you're
welcomed to list them yourself. I'm not sure
that everyone on Sky News supports him. But perhaps
they don't want to breach their employment agreements?
Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 3 July 2021 1:57:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear GrahamY,

And not one mention of the union which insisted it was in the EBA? There are other institutions where Ridd would not have the opportunity to contest this in court because there is no such inclusion.

Trying to make out freedom of speech is something primarily from the right, and happy to shut-down ABC reporters from commenting via their personal twitter feeds, is a little disingenuous I would have thought.

Dear Hasbeen,

As an academic had Ridd been more supportive of AGW he would have been one of the elites you bang on about constantly. So it seems anyone who doesn't take your idiotic world view seriously is elitist.

How base level is that?
Posted by SteeleRedux, Saturday, 3 July 2021 2:52:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The difference SR is that he is not a lying academic, but whistle blowing against the grant hungry liars.
Posted by Hasbeen, Saturday, 3 July 2021 10:20:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
SR.

Congratulations.

“As an academic had Ridd been more supportive of AGW he would have been one of the elites you bang on about constantly. So it seems anyone who doesn't take your idiotic world view seriously is elitist”

My own view entirely. There are some short sighted thinkers on this site. You’ve exposed an example!

Dan
Posted by diver dan, Sunday, 4 July 2021 7:38:59 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy