Calling Tony Abbott a Mad Monk, a passe insult only ever used by morons, is a clear indication that this article will be a load of rubbish not worth reading.

I think when someone who is very prominent represents a particular perspective, in Abbott's case a conservative centre-right position on many issues, they are bound to rock the boat when their views are out of touch with the majority, especially in left-leaning forums like the ABC and academic humanities.

To be frank, it s a tough gig being a conservative trying to shape an electorate, an electorate often not listening to such views

out of touch with the majority,
Chris Lewis,
Despite the fact that I'd rather not see an Labor pollies as far as I can see plus the fact that I supported Abbott when he became PM, I must admit he turned out to be a fizzer.
To award a Royal & to stick up for drug dealers is about as out of touch a politician can be !

ttbn,
Seriously? You're not reading this article because Tony Abbott's nickname is out of fashion as an insult?

Abbott turned out to be a "fizzer" mainly over his failure to amend the HR Act as promised. Apart from that, he was no better or worse than any Liberal leader since Menzies, and certainly better than the one who replaced him.

Calling him names after he has left politics behind is pissy-pants kindergarten stuff.

I think I called Rudd a dud once in an OLO article, and a former academic/journo pointed out I was disrespectful.

I agree with ttbn. Attacking the argument alone always looks better from any analysis, especially from a qualified academic.

I am sorry Mr Rudd.