Mr Opinion is spending years warning everyone about the Chinese and no one is listening.
Mr Opinion,
And, how many of your commodities etc aren't Made in China ?

individual,

True.

And who is responsible: Tony Abbott.

Remember him saying "It's good for Australia, it's gooder for China." just before he took a bite into a raw unpeeled onion.

What a guy!

Lambing Flat.

The slogan of The Bulletin from the 1880s-1890s: 'Australia for the White Man' - mainly aimed at Chinese people.

Immigration restrictions from 1901 until the 1960s.

The core principle of the Labor Party from its inception.

But our Village Idiot thinks he's been the first. I wonder if Arts degrees wither the mind ?

No, only for the unlucky few, those who are perennially infantile.

Can such infants distinguish repressive governments from the people whom they repress ? Does critique always degenerate into racism in their case ?

Joe

Comrade Foul-Mouth,

Australia is so racist that between 1942 and 1945 Australians were even shooting Japanese to keep them from getting into the country. Talk about anti-immigration gone mad!

PS What branch of the CCP are you affiliated with?

To Mr Opinion- I think Loudmouth should be given a homework assignment to write about "racism" from the "racist" view point and how it relates to underlying concerns within society. It seems he did some studies in The Liberal Arts but he apparently did some of his first studies in one of the most left wing institutions of the time- Flinder's University- Matthew Flinders himself not really a lefty perhaps- Loudmouth is not perhaps the legacy that Flinders envisaged.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Flinders

To be fair to Loudmouth and paraphrasing Jesus- "he knows not what he does".

In the past Loudmouth has perhaps emphasised how beautiful and childlike Chinese women are and wishes he was younger- at least that's the way they are perceived by him- standard honey trap- the North Korean's put on a similar show in the recent past. Men do think with 'Johnson'- this is somewhat natural- and can be forgiven- but once in they should think differently.

Women perhaps have replaced the concept of the 'good provider' with the concept of the 'good system'- perhaps effectively replacing the family with socialism- as was said in the sixties Women don't need Men to have children. Do women care about the survival of their families their heritage beyond the immediate present. Perhaps given that traditionally the name is passed through the male line they don't- but passing the name through the female line or having a hyphenated name doesn't work either.

Many people have given up trust for the family over trust for the socialist system- social safety net- this is concerning in a sense.