The Forum > Article Comments > Supreme Court needs to explain why Texas and Ohio were shut out > Comments
Supreme Court needs to explain why Texas and Ohio were shut out : Comments
By David Singer, published 15/12/2020How can the Supreme Court of the United States have ruled on Texas' motion without hearing submissions?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by plantagenet, Monday, 21 December 2020 10:43:18 AM
| |
David,
You're still making the mistake of assuming this is all about the meaning of the constitution. But surely in reality it's about the facts? To determine whether the appointment of electors was "in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct" you need to know what the state legislature has directed. Rather than blindly assuming there's a problem, you need to read the state electoral law. Because unless the state has contravened that, the argument that there's a constitutional problem is untenable. Posted by Aidan, Monday, 21 December 2020 12:22:00 PM
| |
.
Dear plantagenet, . Here is one of my namesake’s bush poems with an Irish flavour I thought you might like : How M'Ginnis Went Missing « Let us cease our idle chatter, Let the tears bedew our cheek, For a man from Tallangatta Has been missing for a week. Where the roaring flooded Murray Covered all the lower land, There he started in a hurry With a bottle in his hand. And his fate is bid for ever, But the public seem to think That he slumbered by the river, 'Neath the influence of drink. And they scarcely seem to wonder That the river, wide and deep, Never woke him with its thunder, Never stirred him in his sleep. And the crashing logs came sweeping And their tumult filled the air, Then M'Ginnis murmured, sleeping, "'Tis a wake in ould Kildare." So the river rose and found him Sleeping softly by the stream. And the cruel waters drowned him Ere he wakened from his dream. And the blossom-tufted wattle, Blooming brightly on the lea, Saw M'Ginnis and the bottle Going drifting out to sea » . Posted by Banjo Paterson, Monday, 21 December 2020 11:01:03 PM
| |
Thanks Banjo
I haven't heard "How M'Ginnis Went Missing" before. I reckon your namesake's got a big future :) __________________________________________ Here's another: THE LOST DRINK (1891) by Banjo Paterson I had spent the night in the watch-house -- My head was the size of three -- So I went and asked the chemist To fix up a drink for me; And he brewed it from various bottles With soda and plenty of ice, With something that smelt like lemon, And something that seemed like spice. It fell on my parching palate Like the dew on a sunbaked plain, And my system began to flourish Like the grass in the soft spring rain; It wandered throughout my being, Suffusing my soul with rest, And I felt as I "scoffed" that liquid That life had a new-found zest. I have been on the razzle-dazzle Full many a time since then But I never could get the chemist To brew me that drink again. He says he's forgotten the notion -- 'Twas only by chance it came -- He's tried me with various liquids But oh! they are not the same. We have sought, but we sought it vainly, That one lost drink divine; We have sampled his various bottles, But somehow they don't combine: Yet I know when I cross the River And stand on the Golden Shore I shall meet with an angel chemist To brew me that drink once more. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Lost_Drink ______________________________________________ I'm signing off for a bit. Merry Christmas Posted by plantagenet, Tuesday, 22 December 2020 7:42:33 AM
| |
#Banjo
You state: "I, personally, am inclined to think that the State legislature should fix the rules – even if it’s only to confirm current practise so far as Pennsylvania and perhaps some of the other States are concerned as well if their electoral rules have been modified since inception." The problem is that the State Legislatures did not fix the rules. They were changed by persons other than State Legislatures. Was this constitutionally permitted? That is what the Supreme Court needed to rule on - and it shirked its duty and indeed its obligation to do so. #Aidan: You state: "To determine whether the appointment of electors was "in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct" you need to know what the state legislature has directed." The State Legislature directed nothing. Some of the changes were as a result of court proceedings in which the State Legislature was not even a party. Was that constitutional or not? The Supreme Court refuses to clarify either way and therein lies the current problem. Every American voter is entitled to be told by the highest court in the land and respect that decision - even if one disagrees with it. That is how the system should work. Posted by david singer, Tuesday, 22 December 2020 10:07:18 AM
| |
Donald Trump has been right all along about voter fraud:
http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/officials-finally-found-a-case-of-a-dead-person-voting-accusing-a-republican-of-pretending-to-be-his-dead-mum-to-vote-for-trump/ar-BB1c7xTk Posted by Mr Opinion, Tuesday, 22 December 2020 11:47:55 AM
|
We've heard of an up and coming poet named after you :)
We here at the NSA really appreciate the rendition of "O Holy Night" you've sent to us at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITIaYoWCPkE&ab_channel=EmerBarryandAffiniti
Looking at that youtube and http://www.affinitimusic.com/biography .
It is a truth of life that Ireland produces the most beautiful woman. But also the "uglist men".
So in that regard all of us at the NSA are Irishmen, more or less :)
We say.
Nollaig Shona do chách! To all the gang at OLO.