Wow plantagenet and you believe that it was not a massive and blatant fraudulent election in favor of sleepy Joe Biden ? Wow, wow, wow.

Here's the thing.

Sovereign states conduct their own elections according to their election laws. Texas challenging the right of colour folk to have a legitimate right to vote and have their vote counted is tantamount to NZ deciding we/Tas/NT/SA/ACT, don't have a right to vote in our own elections. Even ones as manipulated by power brokers and a broken preference system, like ours.

Let me conclude my remarks by affirming that I am a fiscal conservative and socially progressive, like most of middle Australia and most of middle America!

The election is over and the candidate that won the popular vote by more than 7 million votes and over 300 college votes is President Joe Biden! End of story! Albeit, the neo-nazis the brown shirts and lunatic fascists cannot accept the outcome!

Why? Because they are loony toon fascists/white supremists, who seem to believe that you win power with the point of a gun and mass murder!? How many millions of innocent deaths do they need, to finally concede that doesn't work/has never worked?

And are they willing to own their own behaviour and accept the consequences for it on their own final day of judgement. Even if their only crime was to supply or load the weapon(s)?
Alan B.

Hi AlanB, you forgot to mention the destroyers Antifa and BLM etc who do the huge, huge damage, fires etc for their Democrat mates. Cheers and good luck.

.

Dear David (the author),

.

You can rest assured that if there had been even the slightest bit of evidence of massive voter fraud concerning the 2020 presidential election, “Donald the dictator’s” armada of legal and technical experts would have found it.

They obviously didn't find anything. Otherwise, they would have presented it to the courts and the whole world would have known about it.

However, if you think they have overlooked something you should let Rudy Giuliani know before it’s too late. Here is his twitter address : @RudyGiuliani.

To tell you the truth, I think all these shenanigans are simply deceptive manoeuvres by “Donald the dictator” to stoke up the fire and keep his gullible supporters’ blood boiling so that he can syphon off as much money from them as possible either in the form of lump sums or regular monthly or weekly instalments.

"Donald the dictator" knows his supporters have blind faith in him – just as the members of the multiple religious sects in the US have blind faith in their gurus. They obey their guru religiously.

As you seem to be an ardent supporter yourself, David, you might like to contribute to his slush fund. Here are the details :

http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00762591/1471958/

Before you do though, you might like to read the CBS News article of 5 December as well as the earlier Business Insider article of 1 December that provide some details of how the slush fund operates.

“Donald the dictator” keeps 75% of the takings (over $ 200 million at the latest count) and cedes 25% to the Republican Party – which, no doubt, explains at least partly, the loyalty of the majority of the Republican members of Congress to the outgoing president. Fear for their political careers is probably the other major factor that assures their unfailing loyalty.

Thus personal security and ambition take precedence over more noble considerations such as patriotism and respect of American democracy and its institutions.


Here are the links to the articles :

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-save-america-pac-is-raking-in-donations-what-can-that-money-be-spent-on/

http://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/trump-has-raised-at-least-150-million-to-cover-his-bogus-election-challenges-but-most-of-that-money-will-go-to-financing-trumps-future/articleshow/79512363.cms

.

#To all those who have posted comments:

I am not interested in replying because none seek to challenge the major claim in my article - that the Supreme Court of the United States erred in refusing to hear the motion filed by the State of Ohio requesting that the Court interpret the meaning of just one word in the Constitution - "Legislature".

Ohio's stated reason for asking the Court to do so should have been very easy for all of you to understand:

" the States need this Court to decide, at the earliest available opportunity, the question whether the Electors Clause permits state courts (and state executive officials) to alter the rules by which presidential elections are conducted.

The People need an answer, too.

Until they get one, elections will continue to be plagued by doubts regarding whether the President was chosen in the constitutionally prescribed manner."

The voting rules in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin were not changed for the 2020 elections by their Legislatures but by state executive officials - as happened in other States as well.

The reason given by the Court in refusing to hear Ohio's motion was just 8 words: "All other pending motions are dismissed as moot."

Ohio's motion was just 1471 words.

The matter to be resolved - "the meaning of the word "legislature" - in the Constitution" - just 9 words.

If "Legislature" included State executive officials - Biden would be favoured.

If "Legislature" excluded State executive officials - Trump would be favoured.

A ruling either way would have provoked outrage from the other side.

So the Court just shirked doing what it was constituted to do and which it had been granted authority by the Constitution to do - interpret the Constitution.

Slamming the door shut in Ohio's face - when Ohio had the standing to have the Court hear its motion - was wrong in my opinion.

Instead of you all choosing to spend thousands of words talking about anything but the Court's decision to refuse the Ohio motion - focus on that decision and I will reply.

Thank you David Singer for your excellent - although very disturbing article - and comment asking why the Supreme Court did NOT stand up for justice and truth when asked to do so by Ohio.

America and the people expected to and should have been able to rely on the Supreme Court to dispense truth and justice but have been let down so badly that I fear for the good future of America and its people.

Where are all the people of integrity and goodwill, the only one I see and hear with these attributes is President Donald Trump. His 73 million or so supporters need and are entitled to truth and justice from the Supreme Court.