The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML

RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Presidential debates ignore US role in the world > Comments

Presidential debates ignore US role in the world : Comments

By David Singer, published 23/10/2020

Biden paints himself as an internationalist, but doesn't even want to talk about foreign affairs.

  1. Pages:
  2. ‹
  3. 1
  4. Page 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. ›
  9. All
Of course what is really missing in everything that David Singer writes, and all of the phony "debates" about US foreign policy is the real situation in Zionist Israel, both past and present.
See the truth-telling essay Israel Unbounded by Judith Deutsch on the Counterpunch website.
Posted by Daffy Duck, Friday, 23 October 2020 6:59:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ttbn,

Do you mean, electing a Snake-Oil Salesman and Show-Pony failure like Trumpf ?

Christ no. Thank god we've got more sense.

Less than twelve days to go, thank god.

Joe
Posted by loudmouth2, Friday, 23 October 2020 7:16:42 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The peace deals and lack of wars again splattering egg over all those with tds. Still no reporting from abc of Hunter's deal? Of course not after 4 years of fake news and lies they ignore how totally corrupt Obama and Biden were/are.
Posted by runner, Friday, 23 October 2020 8:41:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Joe,

No. I don't mean voting for someone you obviously don't like to lead the country. You would have a choice. You would vote for some lefty wacko as you do now, and I would vote for someone who suited me. No matter which candidate won, we would both have had a say in who we wanted as our country's leader. It would not be left to politicians as it is now.
Posted by ttbn, Friday, 23 October 2020 9:51:29 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ttbn,

I actually like the system we have. I am not a monarchist, but don't see the need for change.
Posted by Chris Lewis, Saturday, 24 October 2020 7:52:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Chris,

The voting system isn't connected to the Monarchy. The UK, the heart of the Monarchy doesn't have our system of voting; it's first past the post there. Only Papua New Guinea and Fiji share preferential voting with us. Pretty embarrassing! The Poms might like the opportunity to elect their Prime Minister, too.

On the Monarchy, I'm not a Monarchist either but, like you, I see no need for change. I admire the Queen; but her successor is an idiot, and the younger ones are sticking their noses into politics - a no no for the Royals. I think that, when Her Majesty dies, the would-be republicans will be in with a chance.

Frankly, I don't think that Australians have the sort of national pride that the republicans think they have. We are are now a mongrel country, wrecked by multiculturalism and immigration. There is nothing unique or particular about being an Australian any more.
Posted by ttbn, Saturday, 24 October 2020 8:26:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. ‹
  3. 1
  4. Page 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. ›
  9. All
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy