we know plantagenet, China, WHO and Cuomo did such a marvellous job with this virus. I am sure you are there biggest fans. Then again don't let facts get in the way of your TDS.

dd that only supports what I said.

Drug use is a symptom.
The need is to consider what's driving people to escape in drugs.
With only matriarchy approved activity allowed for men it's little wonder they're looking for a ways out.

To drive the hunter builder warrior explorer out of men is to destroy them. That's the war on men.

Giday runner

Your wrathfull "godliness" evokes the tortures of the rack http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rack_(torture)

Here's holding up a mirror mate to your absence of "Christian tolerance" http://youtu.be/d9uHhLe6WE0

Correction @runner Rack http://history.howstuffworks.com/10-medieval-torture-devices3.htm

Cheers

The Deadly "Other Measure" of Gillard's "Hate Men" Family Violence Amendments 2011

Divorce/DV law has been politicised into the most devastating weapons of the feminist left. The objective is destroy patriarchy. The result is family court devastation and murder/suicide.

In 2011 the Gillard government guillotined unilateral family law amendments through the Senate to deliberately increase the divorce rate to “liberate” women from family into the workforce & manufacture unmarried left voters dependent on Big Brother protection & welfare .

To pay for the massive increases in single mother welfare the feminist left government imported the Bradley amendments for child support from the USA and disguised them here as “Other Measures” in the Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures [to the Bankruptcy Act]) Act 2011

The US federal Bradley Amendment 1986 still shames the Senators associated. It takes us back to the cruel days of debtors’ prisons. It forbids an alleged “child-support” debt from being retroactively reduced or forgiven. The Bradley law denies bankruptcy protections, overrides all statutes of limitation, and forbids judicial consideration of obvious inability to pay.

The courts must enforce payment regardless of any change in a father’s income, whether he is out of a job, penniless and homeless, medically incapacitated, incarcerated (justly or unjustly), can't afford a lawyer to change assessment, sent to war, or never owed the money in the first place. He is forced to pay even if DNA proves he is not the father or he is never allowed to see his children.

When corporations can’t pay their debts, they can file for bankruptcy and pay off their debts for cents on the dollar, but McClellan’s amendments to the Bankruptcy Act means that a man can never get an alleged “child support” debt forgiven or reduced

Men end up being taxed at 75-80% as well as possibly lawfared every time she has the slightest hissy fit, or gets caught out or just because it’s Thursday. Just switch on The Machine and become both a victim and set for life.

Judges can jail people to make them pay so-called child support even when they have no money to pay. We hear reports that fathers allegedly owe $10 billion in child support. However, what is not mentioned is that 70 percent is owed by men who earn less than $10,000 a year or have no wage earnings at all, so the government bureaucracy is trying to get blood out of a stone.

The money that magically appears from jailed fathers actually comes from grandparents, new partners or family friends. Most Bradley-law victims never come to national attention because mainstream media toe the feminist propaganda line of denigrating men, especially fathers, using the epithet “deadbeat dads.”

A family court judge can ignore current income (or lack thereof) and instead calculate child support on past income or on imputed future income. Another perverse feature of the current system is that child-support payments have nothing whatsoever to do with whether the father is allowed to see his children, and there is no enforcement of his visitation rights.

This system is morally and constitutionally wrong and the Family Violence and Other Measures Bill is particularly evil. It was passed through an impotent Senate without scrutiny under guise of making minor changes and in the knowledge of the harm it had done in the USA and the fact that it was ineffective in producing child support revenue.

I will return to the issue of FALSE ALLEGATIONS