The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Charlottesville, guns, Trump-phobia and 'Their ABC’s groupthink' > Comments

Charlottesville, guns, Trump-phobia and 'Their ABC’s groupthink' : Comments

By Laurence Maher, published 6/3/2020

Readers who are regular viewers of ABC TV news will not need to be reminded that recently the national broadcaster began skiting about how much smarter it is than all us plebs and plodders.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All
Dear mhaze,

You write; "That the ABC is hopelessly biased toward the left viewpoint both as regards Australian, US and indeed global politics is hardly disputable."

What rubbish. Name another organisation which has undergone so many inquiries into bias, or even have protections against bias in its charter. There are none.

The ABC time and time again gets pretty well clean bills of health yet Murdoch drones like yourself keep banging on about bias where there is none.

The ABC went hard after the Greens in a 4 corners expose which was brutal and far nastier than anything directed at the Liberal/National party They also dug through the entrails of the Rudd/Gillard split to a demonstrably far greater degree than what occurred after the Abbott/Turnbull or Turnbull/Morrison leadership changes.

Further name a single ex Labour MP who has a radio show an hour long twice weekly on the national broadcaster.

You are a miserable lot of whinging snowflakes who are trying to bully this institution out of existence because it doesn't follow lock step with your toxic ideology.

Sick of the bloody lot of you I'm afraid. Grow up.
Posted by SteeleRedux, Friday, 6 March 2020 2:08:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Probably Tony Abbott's biggest failure as PM was not to defund this marxist/feminist empire. They strongly backed his backstabbing as they fawned over the regressive Turnbull.
Posted by runner, Friday, 6 March 2020 3:13:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Only the likes of our SR can state bald faced lies as if they are global truth.

He makes an utter fool of himself with this behavior, as even most lefties will admit the ABC is their mouthpiece.

Stating black is white SR is a sure way to lose any credibility you ever had.
Posted by Hasbeen, Friday, 6 March 2020 5:09:13 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Onya SR. I`m with you.
Bunch of right wing whingers.
Posted by ateday, Friday, 6 March 2020 5:24:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
SR,

"Name another organisation which has undergone so many inquiries into bias..."

Come on, SR, even you aren't this clueless. The others don't have enquiries into bias because they aren't required to be unbiased. They are required to be profitable.
I've never said the commercial media isn't biased. Of course they are. Anyone who believes otherwise is just plain thick. Not as thick as someone who thinks the ABC isn't biased, mind you, but up there.

But because the ABC gets lavishly funded by the taxpayer they are supposed to be unbiased. Hence the inquiries.

The trouble is the inquiries are rubbish. Take your example from above. Appoint someone who started their career on the public broadcaster, ended it on another public broadcaster, and spent the rest of the career exposing lefty beliefs. Hook him up with yet another person who sups at the public teat and then ask them to be unbiased. The results were written before the ink was dry on the appointments. Surely you can't believe this was a valid inquiry.

"Further name a single ex Labour MP who has a radio show an hour long twice weekly on the national broadcaster."

Huh? I file that under whatthehellishetalkingabout.

But while you try to work that out, perhaps you could name one or two ABC TV presenters who are from the right.

The place is overrun with left wing bias and even the occasional right wing voice ultimately gets suppressed - eg Gerard Henderson.

There have been some surveys (not fool proof ones, mind you) that show up to 40% of ABC staff favour the Greens. So what they consider unbiased is perhaps a little different to what the rest of the country thinks.

"Sick of the bloody lot of you I'm afraid. "

Yes I'm sure you'd feel much better if everyone would just agree with you. But then we'd all be wrong.
Posted by mhaze, Friday, 6 March 2020 5:30:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hey SteeleRedux,
"although a member of one side committed murder"

Whats the difference between murder and manslaughter?

Answer: Intent.

I'm not convinced James Alex Fields Jr intended to kill Heather Heyer.
I do think both sides were just as bad as each other, both sides determined to get what they wanted.

What I don't understand is the lefts rampage to tear everything down at any cost.

The left: Let's tear this statue down.
The right: Lets just leave it there.

- Pretty obvious which side is causing the problems.
The side which cannot accept things the way they are and wants to take the fight to everything they oppose, their fragile undeveloped minds molded by their demented university professors.

The left probably saw Heather Heyer's death as a win for their cause.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 6 March 2020 7:21:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy