The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Has Morrison had an Epiphany? > Comments

Has Morrison had an Epiphany? : Comments

By Mark Buckley, published 5/2/2020

Has our Prime Minister improved in his demeanour since the bushfire crisis?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
As far as scotty is concerned it`s winning that`s important.
Never mind how, just win.
Posted by ateday, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 9:37:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thanks for another pro labour hate Liberal puff piece! This writer has no credibility as he never listens, evaluates and only goes on his own bias. He should be taken on by the ABC, he is dumb enough! The bush fires are a State responsibility, which he ignored. They were caused because of State Government laziness, inaction and craving to show how green they are. These are mistakes common to all States now and the resultant enquiries will be evasive and fully backed by our totally corrupted media.
At some stage I hope we see some sense but this stupidity is unparalleled in human history.
Posted by JBowyer, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 10:00:08 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I think that Scott Morrison is sitting on the fence for a good reason. Like it or not, for thirty years those who are perpetuating the greatest scientific fraud in history have had almost total support from the media. Most people reluctantly agreed that science must be right because science is always right, and scientists were considered simply impartial purveyors of the truth. Former John Howard said that when his science advisor first told him about HIGW, he automatically believed him because of his own personal high regard for scientists, but he does not believe it anymore.

Like PM Howard, more and more right wing people are beginning to realise that HIGW is primarily another leftist cause like open borders or Islamic immigration, which is intended to destroy the western civilisation that most leftists hate but prefer to live in, and that some scientists can be politically partisan

Morrison probably thinks that HIGW is kooky himself but he also knows that at the present time, a lot of even right wing people still believe in this hogwash and he does not want to upset them. For example Tony Abbott who came right and said that HIGW was rubbish even lost his seat to a HIGW fanatic, although Zali Steggles has no plans for installing wind turbines in Manly yet.

The Labor Party is in a similar position, Shorten lost the election primarily because of HIGW. In his case, the urban elite side of his party wanted no coal mines and 50% renewables. The other side of his party was more concerned with jobs and paying their extortionate electricity bills.

Morrison's best move is to stay neutral and neither please nor displease too much of either side of the left-right divide. One problem the HIGW fanatics have is that they keep maintaining that catastrophe is only an ever receding decade away. As the decades pass and nothing much happens, more and more people will realise they have been had. By then the left will have dreamed up another catastrophe which can only be averted by voting for the left
Posted by LEGO, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 10:09:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
To JBowyer,
Wow, you have a bee in your bonnet don't you, regarding the ABC. You have never heard the expression "Don't shoot the messenger", have you. I'll explain it to you if you want me to. I particularly like your theory that the ABC takes the temperatures around the country, and then they broadcast them, using a dodgy thermometer, and the BOM don't even know they have been duped. (24 Jan, 2020) Stunning. Then, go back over your other comments history, and blush. And as I often say, instead of taking potshots, why don't you expose yourself (in a good way) and put down, in an article, some of your beliefs. I'm sure they will surprise, and appal, anyone with a brain. Why are you guys so quick to attack, without proffering an alternate vision? I know, because you don't have an alternate vision.
Posted by askbucko, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 10:39:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Lego: If there was an academy award for bird's fur, horsefeathers, humbug and the biggest best pork pies? You'd likely win it with your latest contribution to this debate.

I'm picking the next polls will create panic in the coalition and a vain search for a new leader with a better BS sales pitch?

Peter Dutton perhaps, just waiting in the wings for his chance for yet another backstab and endless non-core promises and getting even tougher on border security and our rapidly diminishing rights and censorship of free speech?

Doesn't just warm the cockles of your heart to know we have such a no-nonsense strongman waiting in the wings to stamp on the errant greens, the gay lobby and whistleblowing public servants.

Peter is strong enough to halve pensions and the dole? So things like negative gearing, super Super and fully franked dividends can grow!?
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Wednesday, 5 February 2020 10:48:20 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bucko I know the BOM misrepresent temperature records, it has been proved without any come back on them. The ABC just report green nonsense and back up the corrupt BOM. You can have a whack at me but don't tell lies!
I know I could not put together an article sufficiently interesting and informative enough but you cannot either. However I am sufficiently aware to know this. You, sadly do not.
Posted by JBowyer, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 10:52:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy