Max, do you actually believe your own words?
It's been clarified and peer reviewed, by US, that the world is in a warming phase, coming out of a mini ice age, and this 'cycle', occurs
with boring regularity every few hundred years or so.
As for us humans contributing any CO2 to the mix, is also in question as to EXACTLY, not approx, how much CO2 and how little we are responsible for.
Max, you believe what you want, but I say again the world is a very big thing, and I caution anyone who dares to think that something as insignificant as mankind, by comparison, can influence it, in any meaningful and serious manner.
It would take a GOD-like entity to do that.
Max, are you GOD, or even a close relative?

Max,

Just because these NAS have accepted the broad AGW theory (ie that we've warmed and its partly due to emissions) doesn't mean they accept every piece of balderdash uttered by every climate hysteric about every nuance of the climate issue.

Especially by people who make up claims about special expertise.

Hi Max. Once again you are posting up links to prove your points, which you expect me to look at and comment upon. And in the past I have done just that, but no more. Because despite my good intentions, I now realise it is a one way street with you. Your position is one of "I am right, and I know I am right, so I am not even going to bother looking at any evidence that supports your false position." It is exactly that sort of arrogance which is the reason why the sceptics are now making ground against the once almost unassailable position of the alarmists. You guys are not debating or arguing, you are preaching.

You are now claiming that the predictions of impending doom published in the media were "exaggerations" "taken out of context" and composed only "1%" of media reports. Even your own supporters would look askance at you for that ridiculous statement. Every member of the public knows that for almost 40 years, the media has bombarded the public with nothing but stories predicting impending doom that never happens. And that is why an increasingly sceptical public is beginning to realise it has been duped.

Laughingly, after making such a ridiculous statement, you haughtily declare "Prove me wrong!" That is exactly like you saying that "Elvis is still alive and living in Nashville, Tennessee", and the onus is entirely upon the me to prove he is not still alive. And I you can't prove your statement is wrong, then you must be right. With such incredibly perceptive deductive reasoning like that, Max, no wonder you believe in HIGW.

Now you are claiming that I am not qualified to comment on the 1000 year warming and cooling cycles that anchor my argument. Gee willackers, Max. With logic like that, I suppose that none of us can comment upon political events because we are not politicians? Or opine about whether wars are winnable because we are not generals? Or comment about economic policy directions because we are not frocked economics professors?

LEGO,
>Hi Max. Once again you are posting up links to prove your points, which you expect me to look at and comment upon. And in the past I have done just that, but no more. Because despite my good intentions, I now realise it is a one way street with you. Your position is one of "I am right, and I know I am right, so I am not even going to bother looking at any evidence that supports your false position." It is exactly that sort of arrogance which is the reason why the sceptics are now making ground against the once almost unassailable position of the alarmists. You guys are not debating or arguing, you are preaching.

That's absolute crap! You maybe looked at HALF the ice age video and then promptly forgot what the peer-reviewed sources said actually caused ice-ages to push one of your own crappy pseudo-historical 'guesses' at ice-age theory. So I had to remind you. You paid absolute LIP SERVICE to my answers to your initial questions: remember, this is all about your denial of the climate science. And then when you paid lip service to and then promptly ignored my links to the 'normal' science, you immediately got bored and started rotating again by posting a video with all sorts of 'loaded graph' claims.

You're rotating, not debating. Load 1, ignore answer, Load 2, ignore answer, Load 3, ignore answer. You're a troll dude. A boring pissant anti-science tinfoil hat wearing troll that ignores the findings of every National Academy of Science on the planet.

I watched about half your 'loaded graph' video, and recognised one of them. Google about the American National Parks fire data. The stuff 'cut' by the 'climate alarmists' from before the 1980's is NOT OFFICIAL DATA RECOGNISED BY THE PARKS AGENCIES, but anecdotal. It's on their websites, if you can be stuffed googling something against your own personal anti-science anti-climate religion.

ALTRAV,
we came out of the ice age what... 12,000 years ago, and are due for another one by 3500AD. We're in a COOLING Milankovitch phase but our CO2, according to the laws of physics we've known about for 163 years, IS ACTUALLY COOKING THE PLANET YOU DUMBASS!

Max, whoa, steady on there old chap'
I have no idea as to the TRUTH about all this, I follow the information that makes sense.
There have been too many major cons during my lifetime by very wealthy and evil men, this smacks of the same stuff.
The fact that the earth is warming, doesn't bother me, but the fact that we are responsible for it does, when I note that we humans are too insignificant to cause something the size of the earth, any harm.
So if you want to believe that we are harming the planet, by all means do so, but stop trying to tell me I caused it, because neither you nor NASA can confirm it either way.
So seeing as how you are no more knowledgeable about this topic than the rest of us, I guess that makes you a DUMBASS as well!
As for the science, well it turns out that way back it was realised that the earth cycles through hot and cold periods as it has done forever, and so some brilliant con men decided they would start this global warming farce to make some money, not sure how, but I sense it has to do with govt grants and the like for renewables and so on, and because the earth is warming naturally, they were on a winner because all the science apparently confirmed this.
What the scammers left out was the rest of the science, which told us this was perfectly normal.
Now because humans are not scientists, they are expected to believe what scientists say, and so here we are today.
Thankfully due to more and more people unhappy with this scenario, have decided to look into it, and much to their surprise, they find they are being conned.
And so it is that this whole GW CC thing is hanging by an invisible thread, and looking pretty bad for the alarmists.