Dear Faustino,

«The 1967 war, the one where Israel's neighbours and other opponents sought to wipe it off the map but were crushed by a superior military with right on its side.»

Correct. So what?

- A classical red-herring!

The occupation is an internal Israeli problem. The fact that Israel's neighbours are "not nice" and happen to be idiotic aggressors has nothing to do with it. Ultimately, it is Israel alone which suffers from this occupation. While Israel crushed its attacking neighbours, as indeed it had to under the circumstances, it should have then left the area within a few days, once all enemy forces were extinguished.

«Almost all international bodies have anti-Israel majorities»

And according to this distorted logic, also nearly half the Israeli citizens who also oppose the occupation as well as many Jews around the world that are alienated by Israel's government policies, they too are "anti-Israel", even anti-semitic...

Actually I'm buggered if I know how this article was let through. The title is toxic enough by its self.

Can anyone please explain how the court's decision was anti-Semitic?

The case was brought by an Israeli Westbank wine maker, against the advice even of the Israeli Government.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/grapes-of-wrath-israel-sours-on-west-bank-winery-in-spat-over-eu-labeling/

For the Court to have ruled in favour of the applicant would have meant it regarding the illegal West Bank settlement as part of Israel, something most certainly not accepted by the rest of the world's governments barring perhaps the US.

To be labelling the decision as anti-Semitic is abusive, divisive, contrary to natural justice and demeaning of the word.

All pretty damn shameful.

History seems to have been forgotten. Israel was an existent country
a couple of thousand years before Islam existed.
The trouble started around 680 ad when the Arabs arrived in
Mesopotamia and started ethnically cleaning those countries.
That job is almost complete.
All that was done on the orders of Allah according to the Koran.
In fact Mohammad invented Islam as a Genocidal warlord that indulged
in murder, rape and plunder with pedophilia as a sideline.
As he accumulated power he and his successors left Arabia and invaded
Mesopotamia subjecting those populations to Islam or else.
Assyria was typical, they killed the men and took the women.
Why do you think Syrians speak Arabic now ?

Are you surprised the Jews react the way they do ?
The Koran still commands the Arabs to kill Jews and unbelievers.

If you do not like the above, live with it or you will die of it !

So what exactly is anti-semitic here?
That the EU won't bend over and recognise Israeli land theft and ethnic cleansing is legitimate because 'He saw fit to take it from them and give it to us'?

"The Koran still commands the Arabs to kill Jews and unbelievers."

- And Judaism commands the Jews to exterminate the Palestinians.
http://youtu.be/tFuwnH6vruA

As evil and cruel as Arabs/Muslims might be, this ought to be discussed on different thread(s).

While Israel need not do any favours or make any concessions to the Arabs who call themselves "Palestinians", this does not mean that Israel should shoot itself in the foot because of them. The 1967 occupation destroys Israel from within, thus it should stop ASAP. Good on the Europeans for trying to bring Israel back to its senses!