Dear Hasbeen,

That kid's views are based on peer reviewed and robust science, yours are based on your personal politics.

One doesn't come within a bull's roar of the other.

One might understand (Emporer) Hasbeens objection to this kid having a say regarding her future! Even one that's been mortgaged to the hilt by Hasbeen's mob!

And polluted to within an inch of an extinction event by the practices, business models and ideological imperatives of the same cabal!

And the kids who have to inherit the garbage dump of a world made so by the calloused indifference of the (I'm all right Jack) slaves to the dollar, should just button their lips as this ultra-callous cohort turn their world into a nightmare, not much more inviting than the desolate dark side of the moon!

I'm with her! How dare you and who gave you the right to effectively turn her's and other's heritage into a nightmare!!?

Perhaps you should go to the Penta coal-still church and loudly proclaim that you are a holy joe of the first water!?

And read a couple of passages from an ancient tome to further enhance that facade!? With a frozen smile fixed firmly on a seemingly benign face!?

Perhaps you should include the one that goes, forgive them, Father, i.e., the aforementioned cabal, for they know not what they do? Or if they do? Don't give a rat's?
Alan B.

Does anyone have figures on the carbon foot print of science i.e. how polluting it can be/is ?

SR produce some of that science is not so tainted as to stink to hell.

I recall the "hide the decline" activity was peer reviewed, which shows what a pile of stinking muck peer review is when it comes to climate activists.