The Forum > Article Comments > Protecting minorities does not require sacrificing free speech > Comments
Protecting minorities does not require sacrificing free speech : Comments
By Monica Wilkie, published 24/9/2019In addition to Victoria, most Australian states and territories are reviewing their vilification laws, in the belief current protections are inadequate and require ‘modernising.’
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
I've just come across an interesting article in
"Psychology Today" as to why words can hurt at least\
as much as sticks and stones. We've seen examples from
the reactions of people like Adam Goodes, and many others.
Six revelations are given in the article about the
connection between emotional and physical pain. And it's
pointed out that "language has always mirrored the connection
between emotion and physical pain."
We're reminded that we suffer from "broken hearts," as well
as bones and speak of "bruised feelings" along with toes.
And we're reminded that all this seems intuitively right
because we recognise the common basis of the pain we
experience, whether a throbbing headache or the pain of
missing someone so much that you ache.
The article asks - "Is there really anyone out there who
actually believes the line, "Sticks and stones may break
my bones but words can never hurt me?" Look at the number
of suicides that occur by men and young boys.
There's more on the harm that words can inflict at the
following. It's worth a read:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/tech-support/201308/why-words-can-hurt-least-much-sticks-and-stones