Correction; this line should read;
Lower sunspot counts causes weaker magnetic fields around earth and
therefore less interference to the path of cosmic rays.

To Mr Wrong Opinion.

I don't believe in Creation at all, dummy.

How does your thinking go? "All people who do not believe in HIGW must be Creationists." Gee, that is real deep thinking you got there MO.

I stopped accepting HIGW when one fine day I simply googled "CO2 levels and climate" and noted that for the last 600 million years, CO2 levels and climate had almost no causal affect on each other. There were times when CO2 was very high and global temps very high, and vice versa.

The only causal relationship with global temps and CO2 is when CO2 is in extremely low concentrations, as it is today. That is because the world's oceans hold 50 times more absorbed CO2 than the atmosphere, and cold water holds more than warm water. So when oceans warm, they release CO2, and when they cool, they absorb it.

However, I don't want to over tax your vestigial brain with concepts which are probably way beyond your ability to synapse your neurones.

Another bit of real science debunking ‘AGW’ and all the other propaganda about human induced climate change:-

In a research paper published in Nature Communications on 9 February 2018, the research abstract stated…
‘…we present analysis of shoreline change in all 101 islands in the Pacific atoll nation of Tuvalu. Using remotely sensed data, change is analysed over the past four decades…Results highlight a net increase in land area in Tuvalu of 73.5 ha (2.9%), despite sea-level rise, and land area increase in eight of nine atolls. Island change has lacked uniformity with 74% increasing and 27% decreasing in size. Results challenge perceptions of island loss…

So Mr Opinion, please explain!

Isn't in the Middle East where most non-manufacturing man-made pollution is created ?
Any figures on that Alon ?

Read this link, interesting !

https://www.rumrebellion.club/2019/08/23/a-climate-change-of-hypocrisy/

Individual that is where I got my previous post tit bit from.

Alon, science is not settled by consensus! It is settled by testing, review, retesting etc until a solid result can be held, or until new evidence is discovered which then goes through the same process.

Example, for the past two hundred years or so archaeologists and other related scientific fields have held to the scientific conclusion modern man, the birth of agriculture, mathematics etc etc, commenced in the ‘Cradle of Civilisation’ around what was then know as Mesopotamia and the Tigris/Euphrates river regions circa 6000 odd years ago (roughly 4,500BCE).

Then, approximately 20 odd years ago, and only more recently understood, was the discovery of Gobekli Tebi an archaeological site which for some unknown reason was deliberately covered over to preserve it intact after appropriately 1000 to 1500 years of use, a very bizarre discovery. To add to the mystery, it has now been scientifically confirmed the site was constructed at least 13,000 years ago.

The area is massive and only about 5% of the site has been fully revealed to date. Included in the discoveries are stone carving of animals, humans and other fascinating items. The site also includes megalithic stone carvings arranged in such a manner confirming the builders knowledge of mathematics, astronomy, and other astounding evidence. All of this evidence now scientifically confirmed, proving a group of people lost to history was wandering the planet 7,000 years before the scientifically confirmed birth of civilisation!

Science is never settled, it is continually updated as new facts come to hand. AGW is the same Alon, don’t always believe the science it sometimes gets changed.