The Forum > Article Comments > Was Izzy Folau moral? > Comments
Was Izzy Folau moral? : Comments
By Peter Bowden, published 1/7/2019Both sides can claim ( and fully believe) that they are virtuous, that they in the right, and the opposing viewpoint is in the wrong.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
-
- All
Posted by OzSpen, Saturday, 6 July 2019 9:56:21 PM
|
<<If you possess at least half a brain and a conscience then you should know it's wrong to have sex with children. Were you not a child once? Do you not know to treat others the way you'd like to be treated?>>
I was demonstrating the logical consequences of the ethics of relativism. If I choose what is right for me and I'm the arbiter of right and wrong for me, I must allow all of the people in the universe to pursue the value system that is right for them.
I gave paedophilia as one example of a relativist who chooses to have sex with children. If anyone supports relativism he/she has no grounds for opposing gross wrongs (based on a biblical view of ethics).
I have a full brain and am thinking logically about the consequences of an anything goes morality. You don't seem to get it.