Dear Alan,

«but never ever again misrepresent my words or cast a different meaning on them nor attempt to infer that I've said something in so many words which I've never actually uttered or inferred!»

Still no example of that.

I presume that you are referring to my post from Friday, 17 May 2019 4:50:00 PM, right?

Here again is what I wrote, so as to make it easier for you to point exactly where I misrepresented your words or otherwise inferred anything about things you did or did not say:

<<<
Dear Alan,

«How can religious freedom include the right to discriminate based on stone age inculcated and fatuous belief?»

Religious freedom means the freedom to follow God rather than to follow society and its norms.

While it is possible to be ignorant or deluded about what exactly God wants in a given situation, one is better off to follow, out of the pure and unselfish intention of their love of God, whatever they sincerely believe, even mistakenly, to be God's wishes, rather than to follow a practice, even a better practice, only because society expects it.

If you do not believe that people have the right to follow God the best they understand, then you do not believe in religious freedom.
>>>