Hi Altrav

recently an experiment was done at a couple of US unis. Someone stood on campus with a US flag and then later with an Isis flag. Of course the brainwashed leftist students abused the guy when holding up the American flag far more than when the same guy held up the Isis flag. It is certainly the idiotic leftist Marxist who are far more to blame for the destruction of the West. Muslims have done what they have always done and the leftist fools are the useful idiots even know homosexuals and the like are the first to be beheaded under sharia law.

Foxy,

"Violence is not new to the history of religions,
nor is it a phenomenon solely attached to the
history of Islam+

You can special plead all that you like, but Christ did not exhort His followers to kill, Muhammad did exhort his.

'Christians' who kill in the name of Christ dishonour Him.

Muslims who kill in the name of Muhammad honour him.

That's the big difference.

Is Mise

these things have been pointed out to Foxy many many times. She sticks her head in the sand and just finds a few more websites when truth does not fit her narrative. Its not just the young that are incapable of thinking past their false narratives.

So as not to upset the children, I won't mention names, but it continually amazes me how there are those who refuse to see beyond what they perceive as the truth.
It is precisely this kind of mindset that causes problems, for everyone.
Now I would not mind if the children were the only ones affected, it would be justified and pure Karma, but unfortunately the rest of us become unwilling recipients of the negative outcomes as a result of their lack of maturity and capacity to look beyond their narrow and uncompromising views and attitudes.

Is Mise,

Looking at the 3 major religious traditions that believe in one
God (Christianity, Islam and Judaism) all 3 make references in
their religious texts to both violence and peace. So the fact
that a religious text contains violent verses does not make it
a violent religion. But it is also a fact that a religious text
containing peaceful verses does not make that religion peaceful
either.

As stated earlier violence is not new to the history of
religions, nor is it a phenomenon solely attached to the history
of Islam. I've already pointed out that Christians and
other religions also have a track record of fanaticism.
Religious content may be a catalyst for violent action, but it should be remembered that its reading relies heavily on
human interpretation

It's like talking to a recording.
You can speak all you like but the machine is only programed to say what it has been taught to say, again and again and again and again and.....................................................................
To put words in the last posting, in the form of corrections, which has been mentioned by others repeatedly, but unfortunately that which is programed to speak, only speaks, it does not listen let alone have the ability to reason, so, 'once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more'.
It is utter rubbish that every religion preaches violence.
We will not defer to this when the Koran actively speaks of and quite clearly, about attacking and killing those who do not believe in, or follow Islam and it's teachings.
Now please try and sell the idea that this is not teaching and preaching to kill people, and openly.
You know what, I think I may be maligning kindergarten children by associating this lot with them, how thick do you have to be to even think about, trying to refute the egregious messages being taught by a disgusting 'CULT'!