Philip S.,

Here's the link especially for you dear heart -
as you seem unable to work things out:

http://theconversation.com/how-believers-in-white-genocide-are-spreading-their-hate-filled-message-in-australia-106605

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3962366/Islamic-leader-Kuranda-Seyit-claims-NEVER-terrorist-attack-Australia.html

So, all those plots that Police have managed to foil do not qualify ?

Speaking of hate, let's talk about anger. Mathew 5:22-26 has a good few lessons regarding anger, but one of them is this:

<<Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. Truly I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.>>

Here's the lesson again through the lens of life experience. Listen to people when they are angry with you. Usually there is a reason for their anger. It isn't about hatred and blown up reactions, it's about settling the matters that they have against you. It is also a time when their anger will provoke in them an honesty that they might usually not say. So listen to them again when they are angry because you'll find the things that they have against you to confront or to correct.

In this case the anger and hatred against Muslims has a consistent source. One that is not even looked at usually by the media or the politicians. Which only deepens the wound when we're talking about criminal mobs and terrorists. The media and the political ideology is to see the terrorists and violent mobs as the victims and that no anger should reach them. In this article even the issue is the retaliation of an angry extremist, that demands action from all right wing supporters to clean up their act. The hypocrisy and irony of this is that this violent act could have been avoided if the Islamic world did as the article demands right wing supporters to do. If they cleaned up their own act and had no violence in their communities to be a danger to the public, then there would be no angry opposition at their doorsteps that killed 50 people.

.... Also. The current line that terrorist don't kill that often and talk of small risk, is talk of usurping justice and ignoring crime. This is horrible logic, and will only fuel hatred to those who have cause for their anger. For the victims and the surviving communities to have no available action because any action they take to rectify the sitution is met with, "don't worry about it, these are rare things, and we're not going to try and stop them from happening."

Don't you all see that this will just add anger and hatrered because of removing justice and to ignore wrongs done to them. If FOXY or anyone else is really against hatred then they should purge the logic of terrorism being a rare crime from their minds. The use of that logic is both very wrong and full of error, as well as a source to fuel hateful reactions.

Do not quote it again and remove it from your left leaning lexicon of phrases. It is harmful to justice and a fuel to counter measures of hate.

Just an FYI.

The spectacle brigade's fake stand against hate are gradually exposing themselves & their insidious agenda !
They are the cause !

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-19/sky-news-christchurch-mosque-shooting-live-stream/10912844

I wonder what her reaction was to atrocities committed against Westerners by extremists ?
Did she just say the standard "not all Muslims are like that" or did she actually speak up & condemn the violence ?
Why do we never get to hear or read or see such reactions ? Did she ever express concern what the extremists among her people would eventual bring upon themselves & her people ?
What she doesn't acknowledge is that her people aren't judged by being Muslim, they're judged by what they do & say & don't do & should be saying. Does she expect non Muslims to simply sit back & think "ah well, not all Muslims are bad". I'm afraid non mUslims are just as offended by Muslim atrocities as Muslims are about non Muslim atrocities.
There is no difference in being a victim but there is a huge difference if only one side is allowed to object !