I am still not convinced on all this GW or CC hoo haa.
I note that the two largest countries (population) in the world, and arguably with some of the most intelligent people in the world, are in fact building new fossil fueled power stations.
China and India.
Now either they've got it wrong, or we've got it wrong.
After realising that the countries who are allied to the USA, all are GW, CC promoters, it leaves me with all kinds of doubts.
After a bit more thought it began looking very much like the 'elite' are at it again.
But to what end?
How do they benefit from this ruse?
Frustrated at not coming up with anything, I put it out to you guys on OLO, and maybe some of you have a credible theory to explain why we are being lied to once more.

Never mind the made up human population scare mongering. The absolute maximum population we will experience is circa 11B, we are now in a linear rate of growth not exponential as some would argue.

Additionally termites currently produce more Co2 than humans, cull them first if you have a problem with GW or CC or whatever name they call it now.
Galen

billions of folk hammering your door down to take advantage of your very generous offer!
AlanB,
So, what's your proposal to curb population growth ?

Individual:
First, read what I've already written. Which is, the only successfully trialled method of curbing and dramatically slowing population growth below replacement, has only ever been achieved by the education of the female population.

To allow them to actually believe, they are able to choose whether or no to become involuntary incubators as virtual sex slaves, minus the right to refuse a sex-crazed aggressive abusive male. "Sex slave owner"!

That they the female populations are half the population and possibly superior if not the equal of the other half!?

And borne out by population census numbers, that show with the education of the vast bulk of previously uneducated female populations, there is an increase in the general wealth and with that increase in economic well being, economic security/social welfare.

Population rises are first severely curtailed then go backwards below replacement numbers.

This is not good news for the exploitive (extreme capitalist) class, who nee poverty and unmet need to provide their lowest common denominator, personal wealth producing product, for their accumulation of "purloined" wealth.
Alan B.

http://divermag.com/letter-to-the-women-of-the-world-by-hans-hass/

AlanB,
I have put this link up several times on OLO over the years. never did get any reaction to it.
I'm in total agreement with your last post. (no, not the one played on the Bugle)

JESUS! Alan, WTF.
In one entry on OLO you have destroyed whatever cred and ability to reason you seem to have demonstrated in the past.
Your 'allegations' are more appropriate in a 'womens rights' march or rally.
I reckognise women as women, and nothing more or less.
I do not look to women for leadership and guidance beyond that of family related issues.
This new BS pushed by the SNAGS and NEUTERS along with the majority of queers, is not what nature tells us, and it's not within the boundaries of 'human nature'.
This push for women is unfounded and is backfiring all around us.
Look back at how many women in high profile positions have failed.
I do not subscribe to this extreme discrimination of men by the push to have 50% of women in all levels of employment, even the boardroom.
If a woman has the 'balls' to make the hard decisions, she is not a woman.
And if that is the case, she is damaged goods, and I would not want her anywhere near any form of decision making.
Anyway I thought this topic was covered and put to bed some time ago.
It was proven that as long as women had periods, they were too prone to mood and emotional swings, which ultimately lead to their decisions being compromised, questioned or brought into disrepute.
After menopause, was a different scenario.
By then it was deemed that their 'use-by' date was well and truly past.
So Alan, if you were just some guy out there I would say that your comments were to impress the fairer sex, with a view to helping you 'have your way' with them.
I sense that's not the case, so if that's not the case then mate, you're on your own.
I have to warn you, with the kind of language you are using, it will not bode well for your standing amongst the MEN in any community, ANYWHERE!