vU, I had no inkling of the bias about women, that you mention.
And some would dare challenge me over my criticism of the continual badgering we cop from the feminist movement.
Based simply on what you have said about women and the bias in their incarceration compared to men, I am shocked and angered, with justification.
Then we have those that dare question men and our attitudes.
This one fact alone is enough to justify physical interaction between the sexes, if only to allow the men satisfaction of redress.
Typical of this place, again proving to be a most disgraceful country.
Funny you should mention 'getting out of this country', I find your comment most comforting, as my wife and friends will attest to my preaching the very same mantra.
In fact some 39 years ago whilst in the USA I had a moment where I pondered whether to return home, if not for the fact I was getting married a couple of days after my return.
Ah the things we could have/should have done.
I know for a fact, had I settled in the US at that time, I would have been much more successful and way ahead of my game, than having the egregious misfortune of trying to succeed in a cesspool like Australia, with excrement for people.

ALTRAV, just to finish up on your last point about women and the judiciary, try these links -

Do Women Get Lighter Sentences Than Men?
http://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/do-women-get-lighter-sentences-than-men/

And -

SENTENCING FEMALE OFFENDERS IN THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT
http://aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/proceedings/downloads/16-naylor.pdf

And here's one of the luuvies advocating for the elimination of women's prisons altogether bar one, maybe -

How can we mitigate the crime that is female over-imprisonment?
http://theconversation.com/how-can-we-mitigate-the-crime-that-is-female-over-imprisonment-51563

Written by -

Mirko Bagaric
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/author.asp?id=3915

Who used to post his stuff up on this site, but now finds The Conversation's audience more agreeable.

You see the thing is that it's not official. It's just that judges when sentencing are advised to consider circumstances. Of course in the case of females they all come from a disadvantaged class due to the patriarchy, claim they're victims of family or sexual violence, and naturally some horrid toxic man did something that made them do it. And then they cry in self-pity, which shows the judge they are really, truly remorseful.

Leftist style gender equality, it's fabulous stuff isn't it?

Anyway, I'm off thread here so I'd better put an end to it.