Firstly, genocide is a human device for totally eliminating the enemy. It's a system that has proved its efficiency over many millennia of human history.
Genocide is an innate human brain function. No “side” is exempt from its implementation.

Muslims one, the West nil.

Secondly, no logic is useful in deradicalising religious nutters outside of old Father Time. (And isolation).
Religious nutters are not confined to Muslims. All religions have their fair share.

Muslims two, the West nil

The problem with Muslim radicals is Saudi Arabia. They fund it.

Muslims three, the West nil

To reduce the funding of radical terrorism by the Saudis, the West needs to reduce its dependence on ME oil wells.
Fess up to the problem.
And confront the Saudis with the same violence metered out to other ME dictatorships.
(Not going to happen).

Muslims four, the West nil.

Game over, a resounding win for Islamic terrorism! Raaaa.

Nobody claiming the qualifications this person claims should be asking this question. Muslim terrorists see us fit only for death or slavery. The same sentiment is also popular with Muslims who don't actually engage in terrorism. Those who might say they don't hold us in contempt are either liars on not true Muslims. It's all in the Koran for anyone to see

Jihadist and butchers of unborn are motivated by the same spirit

So there we have it folks....the Nazis were Muslims in drag and the camps were holiday resorts that suffered from the black plague leading to so many premature deaths.
The first testament of the Bible is all about flower power, love to all and free reefers. The second is not much better, representing the Christians who were on the other side of the fence at Auschwitz and other camps.
Let us not forget the, 'butchers of the unborn' as mentioned, relating obviously to abortionists who have the temerity to believe that exercising the responsibility over unwanted pregnancies is a responsible act.
....and then we have those brilliant fertile mentally challenged pygmies claiming to know what is in the mind of all Muslims....nah!, nothing wrong here

Well, given the average radicalised J'hardist, has the average IQ of the ambient temperature?
It's hard to conceive of them being capable of drawing any such distinction and unable to think about much more than their belly and what hangs off of it? And driven like froth-mouthed mad dogs, by unreasoned unfathomable hate!
We have to stop funding their activities by buying any imported oil or oil derivative! NO QUESTION!
Moreover, further limit their murderous activities with better border security that absolutely, must include completely covert space age lie detection equipment,e.g., CAFR and thermal imaging!
Alan B.

'Let us not forget the, 'butchers of the unborn' as mentioned, relating obviously to abortionists who have the temerity to believe that exercising the responsibility over unwanted pregnancies is a responsible act.'

drain the swamp

Do terrorists view us as human?

I hope not, but if they do then it explains their behaviour because humans are expendable - just bodies, just animals with a big brain, so terrorists laugh at the Western folly of humanism, of irrationally considering human life as sacred.

Had they understood who we really are, that we who at present happen to dwell in a human body are no less than God, that who we truly are is no different to who Muhammad was (only, as Sufis believe, Muhammad, peace be upon him, was fully aware of it, while we at present are not), then Wow - had they knew the truth, would they do the same to themselves? would they do the same to their Prophet?

They view us as inferior humans which makes them not just racist but very hypocritical as well.

Terrorists are useful stooges that can be motivated by religion for the mainly political ends of others. In the case of Muslims it's the removal of western interests from their lands and the reinstatement of autonomy. Bin Laden specifically said that was his aim but religion was the tool he used.

It's only religion that removes the humanity from people, with non-Muslims classified as Infidels, non-Christians classified as heathens and non-Jews classified as sub-human cattle intended for exploitation and slavery. One Christian religious sect classifies black skinned people as cursed and unworthy of membership, or at least official status within their church. Women are treated likewise.
Another says that blacks are descended from apes but whites were made divinely by God (except for Jews who were made by Satan.) Such tolerance for their fellow man!

Science build skyscrapers and aeroplanes but only religion can bring them together and there's little difference between a Caliphate or a Christian theocracy that's trying to establish itself in the USA.

Do those that speak of "butchers of the unborn" regard women as human or just babymaking machines to pump out more members, even if it kills them?

Going by recent revelations, you can't molest children if they are never born, right?

removal of western interests from their lands and the reinstatement of autonomy
rache,
I'm a little perplexed with this explanation for doesn't every fanatic cleric make statements such as "we shall conquer the world". That doesn't at all sound like just removing westernern interests & reinstate autonomy. That implies total domination !

Come to think of it, don't they see us as they are themselves ? Sort of explains it all to my mind.

World domination is the ultimate fantasy of all religion and their common goal is to "convert and save" everybody.

Crazed mullahs speak for the entire Muslim population as much as radical evangelicals or the KKK speak for all of the West or Alan Jones and Andrew Bolt speak on behalf of all Australian society.

The history of rise of modern militant Islam can be traced back to the USA overthrowing a democratic government in Iran and appointing the Shah as leader, who literally killed off all his moderate opposition, leaving the way open for Ayotallah Khomeni to establish a theocracy. Various other Muslim countries (but not all) disaffected by the actions of the West were inspired to follow that lead.

The majority of the world's Muslims live in Indonesia, Pakistan. Bangla Desh and India. Only about 10% live in Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran combined.

rache,
The indonesian variety are rather reasonable & kind in comparison to their Afghan, middle east counterparts & Christians.
There were huge muslim demonstrations in support of the christian Governor of Jakarta when the hardliners put him in prison.
Indonesia may well be the largest Muslim nation but it is also the most sensible, even of non-muslim.

Dear Rache,

Anyone who desires world-domination cannot be religious because religion liberates us from all worldliness.

Well they might still pretend to be religious, nothing new about that, but anyone who has eyes doesn't fall for that.

individual,
That was part of my point. Muslims have been universally labelled on the basis of the actions of a very small minority.
It would be the same as seeing and treating all Christians as if they were Mormons or Amish or treating all Jews as Zionist extremists.

Yuyutsu,
Despite the notion of "unworldliness", while many religions quietly encourage membership, Christianity in particular requires proselytism as part of their doctrine (Named the Great Commission).
"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit..."
The practice is even illegal in many countries and I'm yet to have a Hindu, Muslim or Sikh missionary knocking on my door or handing out pamphlets trying to sell me the Good News.