Leo

As amusing as ever, your comments amount to flaming which I gather are disallowed by the rules of the site.

So you suggest that https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/executive-summary/ does not correspond to science? The Report is supported by numerous peer reviewed research articles published in Journals.

The flea says:” you suggest that ttps://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/executive-summary/ does not correspond to science? The Report is supported by numerous peer reviewed research articles published in Journals”.

Where did I say it was not science, flea? You are lying again in your assertion of something I said. What did I say, and where and when did I say it?
Remember what a fool you made of yourself the last time you told a blatant lie about something you alleged that I said?
Where is the Report supported in “numerous peer reviewed articles published in journals”?, or is that another of your baseless fantasies?
On what basis do you assert that I am “flaming, and what breaches of OLO requirements are you asserting I have made. Are you asserting that I have said anything untrue, or purely inflammatory?
If so, please specify the items, and your complaint.
I pointed out that your reference was not relevant, and you have failed to address that fact.

Leo

You have also flamed ateman, and AlanB.

The word "fraud" is often a word you use against anybody who supports the science of anthropogenic climate change. To deny that you would be telling a lie.

Quote:

"The oil industry's leading pollution-control consultants advised the American Petroleum Institute in 1968 that carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels deserved as much concern as the smog and soot that had commanded attention for decades.

Carbon dioxide was "the only air pollutant which has been proven to be of global importance to man's environment on the basis of a long period of scientific investigation," two scientists from the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) told the API."

From:

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/13042016/climate-change-global-warming-oil-industry-radar-1960s-exxon-api-co2-fossil-fuels

Quote:

"In addition to warming, many other aspects of global climate are changing, primarily in response to human activities. Thousands of studies conducted by researchers around the world have documented changes in surface, atmospheric, and oceanic temperatures; melting glaciers; diminishing snow cover; shrinking sea ice; rising sea levels; ocean acidification; and increasing atmospheric water vapor."

From:

https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/executive-summary/

In providing the above reference in your last post, why did you make reference void by taking off "h" of "http"?

Chapters from the reference provide numerous references with prefix of "doi" chichis an indication of their authenticity through registration. Those chapters are available from the reference provided, the hyperlink unmistakably is on heading of front page ... it goes CSSR, About, Chapters …."

A part sentence from the quote from 1968 reference:

“Carbon dioxide was "the only air pollutant which has been proven to be of global importance ….”

Sentence from reference you misquoted:

"In addition to warming, many other aspects of global climate are changing, primarily in response to human activities.

Both clearly refer to anthropogenic climate change.

Tell me ant, are you a useful idiot, & actually believe this garbage you preach?

Or are you a gravy train rider, profiting from the garbage?

The flea constantly posts baseless lies in support of the climate fraud, and then has the temerity to accuse others of “flaming”, which is his constant activity.
If you are not guilty of fraud, flea, all you have to do is give us a reference to science which shows a measurable human effect by human activity on global climate. You have been asked repeatedly for this, and show your lack of breeding, and ignorance, by ignoring the question.
Do you assert that your lies and insults do not amount to flaming?
Here is some honest, real science, for your assistance, from Robert Carter in 2007:”
The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate Change
IS CARBON DIOXIDE A DANGEROUS POLLUTANT? Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a colourless, odourless gas that has been present in earth’s atmosphere through time in trace amounts ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand parts per million (ppm). Average atmospheric values over the last few hundred thousand years"
http://members.iinet.net.au/~glrmc/2007%2005-03%20AusIMM%20corrected.pdf

ateboy

My apologies for not providing your name properly in post to Leo Lane.

Hasbeen

Yes, I do believe in science.
I do not get any payment for what I write.

Already millions of people die or are hit by severe medical conditions created by emissions from fossil fuels. The majority of those people are poor and live in Asian countries.

Many science disciplines provide consilience to climate science; meanwhile those who take a denier view are not able to argue from a consilience viewpoint.

BP says in relation to climate change:

"There is an increasing consensus that climate change is linked to the consumption of carbon based fuels and that action is required now to avoid further increases in carbon emissions as the global demand for energy increases."

Peak science bodies believe in anthropogenic climate change.

Where is the conclusive evidence that knocks out the science of climate change?