The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Scientific fails and the Great Barrier Reef > Comments

Scientific fails and the Great Barrier Reef : Comments

By Peter Ridd, published 2/2/2018

The 'Replication Crisis', well-reported in peer reviewed articles, shows that when scientific papers are checked around 50% of recently published science is wrong.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All
If you subscribe to Graham's email notifications about new topics posted and material from other sites, you will see a post from Jennifer Marahasy concerning Prof. Peter Kidd who is being persecuted by his employer, James Cook University, for his scepticism about supposed damage to the Red.
Posted by ttbn, Friday, 2 February 2018 9:53:29 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Reef, not the Red. Bloody predictive text!
Posted by ttbn, Friday, 2 February 2018 9:55:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ttbn Quote "Scientific alarmism is only 50% wrong? It is a surprise to find that it is not more (and it probably is) as unethical and downright crooked scientists jockey for taxpayer grants to fabricate 'evidence."

Perfect example on CNN few days ago group of scientist leaving America to take up positions in France just near the end they mentioned the Million dollar grants they were getting, there is big money to be made by scientists with regard to so called global warming.

One female scientist said "she could not possible work in a country with a President who was a climate change denier"

I would bet if Trump offered her a few million dollar grants she would have taken it.

Money talks BS walks.
Posted by Philip S, Saturday, 3 February 2018 12:08:13 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Philip Seymour

The yanks are lucky to have got rid of the scientist who couldn't work in the same country as Trump, and France deserves her.
Posted by ttbn, Saturday, 3 February 2018 8:58:11 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
There's that predictive text again. I typed PhilipS and it comes up Philip Seymour. Does anyone know how to switch it off?
Posted by ttbn, Saturday, 3 February 2018 9:01:02 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
. One female scientist said "she could not possible work in a country with a President who was a climate change denier" ;

so she moves to a country where Islamic terrorism ( a real threat) is a major issue. How dumb can the swamp be. Thankfully for America she is gone.
Posted by runner, Saturday, 3 February 2018 10:20:07 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy