The Forum > Article Comments > Scientific fails and the Great Barrier Reef > Comments
Scientific fails and the Great Barrier Reef : Comments
By Peter Ridd, published 2/2/2018The 'Replication Crisis', well-reported in peer reviewed articles, shows that when scientific papers are checked around 50% of recently published science is wrong.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
There seems to be more and more of these annual hordes swelling our coastal towns and cities. You're there as usual as the barking junkyard dog in attack mode! And as usual without reason!
Sustainable development would allow these places to grow naturally, divert their runoff/effluent back inland and to serve the local populace first and foremost, rather than the white shoe brigade, realtors and exploitative tourist operators.
You're not the only seaman in the world. I haven't bothered to endlessly blow my trumpet they way you do, but I spent a considerable portion of my adult life operating an ocean going dredge and using it as the main pump, and shelter, while we built jetties and wharves up and down the coast. Built harbors and augmented islands, with recovered original sandy beaches that had been taken over by the endless expansion of mangrove swamps. Even built a couple of islands!
Pull your head in grumpy. I already knew the reef was big, as big as Victoria in fact and a submerged mountain range topped with islands and multiple reefs, lots!
Just because I spent a lot of time on a road, doesn't make me an expert on the surrounding terrain or landscape! Get over yourself genius!
Alan B.