The Forum > Article Comments > Inconvenient fact: Native title can only exist if Australia was settled, not invaded > Comments
Inconvenient fact: Native title can only exist if Australia was settled, not invaded : Comments
By Sherry Sufi, published 22/1/2018Whether Australia's colonisation by the British Empire should be classified as an invasion or settlement is not a question of mere semantics.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
You wrote;
“Fire destroys all understory, much of which like legumes, is absolutely essential to superior land management. As is ground aerated by earthworms and dung beetles etc.”
That is really pretty clueless my friend.
Aboriginal fire practices, at least in my area, are far less damaging than current CFA methods in fuel reduction. Just a couple of months ago there was a particular site that was split in two for the purposes of comparison for some fuel reduction. One was burnt using traditional methods and the other using current methods.
The traditional method required twice as many people and took twice to conduct, but the intensity was far less. The CFA was far quicker on the day however due to the intensity of the fire they had to monitor it over the next few days returning twice to attend to smoldering remnants.
We are in an area that was rich with murnong, a indigenous daisy yam, and it stretched for nearly 100 kilometers. The first explorers remarked on the endless fields of yellow murnong flowers. The murnong was a vital part of the traditional diet and fire was employed to keep these vast fields open for the propagation of it and the native grasslands.
This gives lie to the notion that indigenous fire practices in the area were scorching the earth and destroying legumes.