The Forum > Article Comments > Inconvenient fact: Native title can only exist if Australia was settled, not invaded > Comments
Inconvenient fact: Native title can only exist if Australia was settled, not invaded : Comments
By Sherry Sufi, published 22/1/2018Whether Australia's colonisation by the British Empire should be classified as an invasion or settlement is not a question of mere semantics.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
If my take on events is right, it seems that the British were engaged in a similar 'war' as we all are today. I see little difference between the random attacks of ISIS on the world and the random attacks of the abo's on the Poms back then.
The Poms were settled in some form of structure like we are today (our homes). The abo's would come out of the bush attack at random and if they survived the retaliatory barrage of bullets, would return to their respective place of domicile somewhere in the bush.
No different than our terrorists of today. There is no doubt in my mind, semantics and interpretations aside, that the poms invaded, even if you call it a 'soft invasion'.
We are still tolerating the abo terrorists still today. Whether all the greens and lefties like it or not, QEII owns Australia, yes, OWNS.
I did not give my consent for that blithering bastard of a stupid moron Keating to 'give' anything to the abo's, let alone give anything 'back' to them.
The bloody left together with the greens has absolutely no grasp on politics and running a country. In fact ALL these poly mongrels think it's a popularity contest as to who can give away the most lollies.
The bastards are like pedophiles.
So it is clear Australia was invaded! Not settled! The proof has been on-going from the time the Poms first landed, and we are still being attacked. How stupid can people be if they cannot see the facts/truth.