Not_Now.Soon,

All creationist arguments appealing to the second law of thermodynamics are debunked at http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html#CF.

To Toni.

[Nope, that's rubbish]

That's exactly what I mean. There's no known explaination to fit that narrative. At least not any that I've known. However, I'm not trying to make scientific discoveries or form explanations from the bible in order to trust it. I don't need to justify it, I already trust it. Because I trust God and trust the bible to be from Him. Take a moment to consider that. I know that line of reasoning would blow up in your face but just consider it.

When you trust someone, do you keep an eye on them, waiting for them to mess up so you can then remove that trust? That doesn't sound like trust to me. It sounds like an unhealthy relationship. When you develope a trust in someone, for whatever scope that trust exists in, do you continually need them to prove themselves before continuing to trust them? A machanic knows cars better then I do, and his digonisis (if I trust him) is worth listening to without a constant feed on proving he is still a machanic. Same with a doctor, a parent, a teacher, or anyone you find trust in for a specific field of understanding or responsibility.

(Continued)

(Continued)

As for the law of thermodynamics. I don't think you understand the scope of the problem. If a system begins in nothingness, it doesn't end in complexity and life. Having the sun as a battery to lessen the rule doesn't fix the issue. The issue is why isn't earth as barren as Mars?

A second issue of this is the massive complexity of everything. Of anything. Study the human anatomy and all the parts of it. Thinking that single cells decided to work together or just developed the ability to work together with one conscienceness, doesn't jive with the rule of entropy. Simply stated, evolution and entropy shouldn't both exist the way they do if both rules are equal.

The third issue is around using evolution in the scope of the beginnings of the world. If that theory exists at the beginning then not just complexity is an issue but so is diversity. Giving birth to different species becomes an issue. Not mutations within a species, but changing from one species to millions of species.

Those are holes in the current explanations of Earth's beginnings. Not a big deal, regardless if we understand how we got here or not, we're still here. Keep plugging away on our understanding, and living life.